Symbolic IO Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 15 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Symbolic ranks #19,208 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 15 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #19,208
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 14th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.2/100)
- 11.3
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R19208 · US Corporation #19,208 · 15 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 15 grants
- MID-PACK #19,208/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Superior Energy…
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.2/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 11.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Superior Energy Services, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Symbolic’s 24.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Symbolic
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Symbolic IO · this assignee 24
Symbolic IO · this assignee
24 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Symbolic's Innovation Score is 24.2/100 (14th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Symbolic?
Each dot is one of Symbolic’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Symbolic’s own 11.3 claims/patent is at or below the 17.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Symbolic's grants concentrate
Symbolic IO Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 40% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Symbolic sits between Superior Energy Services, LLC and Taica Corporation.
Who files at Symbolic's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Superior Energy S…
Superior Energy Services, LLC
15 patents
- Supply
Supply, Inc.
15 patents
- Surfaces Southeast
Surfaces Southeast, LLC
15 patents
- Suzhou Shengkang…
Suzhou Shengkang Plastic Electric Co., Ltd.
15 patents
- Symeo
Symeo GmbH
15 patents
- Synergy Microwave
Synergy Microwave Corporation
15 patents
- T EN Process Tech…
T.EN Process Technology Inc.
15 patents
- Taica
Taica Corporation
15 patents
- Symbolic IO ◀
Symbolic IO Corporation
15 patents
What this shows Symbolic holds 15 patents at rank #19,202, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Symbolic
By rank, the assignees closest to #19,202 in granted patent volume.
- Superior Energy Services, LLC #19,198 · 15 patents
- Supply, Inc. #19,199 · 15 patents
- Surfaces Southeast, LLC #19,200 · 15 patents
- Suzhou Shengkang Plastic Electric Co., Ltd. #19,201 · 15 patents
- Symeo GmbH #19,203 · 15 patents
- Synergy Microwave Corporation #19,204 · 15 patents
- T.EN Process Technology Inc. #19,205 · 15 patents
- Taica Corporation #19,206 · 15 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Symbolic's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Symbolic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
24 14th percentile higher than 14% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 | 33.3% |
| 2016 | 4 | 26.7% |
| 2017 | 5 | 33.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 6.7% |
Which technologies does Symbolic IO Corporation patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Symbolic IO Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Symbolic IO Corporation's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 40% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #19,208 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Symbolic IO Corporation against Superior Energy Services, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.