Suzhou Miracpharma Technology Co., Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 16 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Suzhou ranks #18,153 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 16 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #18,153
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 16th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.8/100)
- 9.4
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R18153 · Foreign Corporation #18,153 · 16 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 16 grants
- MID-PACK #18,153/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH St Louis Medical…
- CPC-NARROW C07D · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.8/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 9.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: St. Louis Medical Devices, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Suzhou’s 24.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Suzhou
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Suzhou Miracpharma… · this assignee 25
Suzhou Miracpharma… · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Suzhou's Innovation Score is 24.8/100 (16th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Suzhou?
Each dot is one of Suzhou’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Suzhou’s own 9.4 claims/patent is at or below the 16.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Suzhou's grants concentrate
Suzhou Miracpharma Technology Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 93.8% of grants classified under C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Suzhou sits between St. Louis Medical Devices, Inc. and Syntropy Network Limited.
Who files at Suzhou's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- St Louis Medical…
St. Louis Medical Devices, Inc.
16 patents
- Starfire Industri…
Starfire Industries LLC
16 patents
- Sunstone Informat…
SunStone Information Defense, Inc.
16 patents
- Sundance Spas
Sundance Spas, Inc.
16 patents
- Synchron Australi…
Synchron Australia Pty Limited
16 patents
- Syndicate Sales
Syndicate Sales, Inc.
16 patents
- Synthekine
Synthekine, Inc.
16 patents
- Syntropy Network
Syntropy Network Limited
16 patents
- Suzhou Miracpharm… ◀
Suzhou Miracpharma Technology Co., Ltd.
16 patents
What this shows Suzhou holds 16 patents at rank #18,153, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Suzhou
By rank, the assignees closest to #18,153 in granted patent volume.
- St. Louis Medical Devices, Inc. #18,149 · 16 patents
- Starfire Industries LLC #18,150 · 16 patents
- SunStone Information Defense, Inc. #18,151 · 16 patents
- Sundance Spas, Inc. #18,152 · 16 patents
- Synchron Australia Pty Limited #18,154 · 16 patents
- Syndicate Sales, Inc. #18,155 · 16 patents
- Synthekine, Inc. #18,156 · 16 patents
- Syntropy Network Limited #18,157 · 16 patents
Leaders in C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Suzhou's primary technology class.
Suzhou's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 16th percentile higher than 16% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 6.3% |
| 2017 | 6 | 37.5% |
| 2018 | 6 | 37.5% |
| 2019 | 3 | 18.8% |
Which technologies does Suzhou Miracpharma Technology Co., Ltd. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Suzhou Miracpharma Technology Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Suzhou Miracpharma Technology Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds), 93.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C07D
- Ranked #18,153 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Suzhou Miracpharma Technology Co., Ltd. against St. Louis Medical Devices, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.