Suitable Technologies, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04W (Wireless Communication Networks).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Suitable ranks #33,460 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #33,460
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 20th percentile
- by Innovation Score (26.4/100)
- 21.1
- avg claims per patent
- -86%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R33460 · US Corporation #33,460 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #33,460/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Strider Sports…
- CPC-NARROW H04W · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 26.4/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 21.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -86% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Strider Sports International, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Suitable’s 26.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Suitable
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Suitable · this assignee 26
Suitable · this assignee
26 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Suitable's Innovation Score is 26.4/100 (20th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Suitable?
Each dot is one of Suitable’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Suitable’s own 21.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 5.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Suitable's grants concentrate
Suitable Technologies, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H04W (Wireless Communication Networks). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Suitable sits between Strider Sports International, Inc. and Sun Scientific, Inc..
Who files at Suitable's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Strider Sports In…
Strider Sports International, Inc.
8 patents
- Stryker Puerto Ri…
Stryker Puerto Rico Limited
8 patents
- Suburban Manufact…
Suburban Manufacturing, LLC
8 patents
- Sud Scrub
Sud Scrub Inc.
8 patents
- Sulfateq B V
Sulfateq B.V.
8 patents
- Sumitomo Forestry
Sumitomo Forestry Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- Summers Manufactu…
Summers Manufacturing Company, Inc.
8 patents
- Sun Scientific
Sun Scientific, Inc.
8 patents
- Suitable ◀
Suitable Technologies, Inc.
8 patents
What this shows Suitable holds 8 patents at rank #33,470, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Suitable
By rank, the assignees closest to #33,470 in granted patent volume.
- Strider Sports International, Inc. #33,466 · 8 patents
- Stryker Puerto Rico Limited #33,467 · 8 patents
- Suburban Manufacturing, LLC #33,468 · 8 patents
- Sud Scrub Inc. #33,469 · 8 patents
- Sulfateq B.V. #33,471 · 8 patents
- Sumitomo Forestry Co., Ltd. #33,472 · 8 patents
- Summers Manufacturing Company, Inc. #33,473 · 8 patents
- Sun Scientific, Inc. #33,474 · 8 patents
Leaders in H04W (Wireless Communication Networks)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Suitable's primary technology class.
- Qualcomm Incorporated 17,987 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 11,683 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 11,202 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 10,885 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 10,282 in class
- Apple Inc. 6,306 in class
- AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. 3,725 in class
- Intel Corporation 3,691 in class
Suitable's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 20th percentile higher than 20% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 2019 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2020 | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Suitable Technologies, Inc. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Suitable Technologies, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Suitable Technologies, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04W (Wireless Communication Networks), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04W
- Ranked #33,460 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Suitable Technologies, Inc. against Strider Sports International, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 26.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.