Soft Machines Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 17 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Soft ranks #17,212 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 17 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #17,212
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 23rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.1/100)
- 20.2
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R17212 · US Corporation #17,212 · 17 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 17 grants
- MID-PACK #17,212/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Sica S P A
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.1/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Sica S.P.A. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Soft’s 27.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Soft
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Soft Machines · this assignee 27
Soft Machines · this assignee
27 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Soft's Innovation Score is 27.1/100 (23rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Soft?
Each dot is one of Soft’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Soft’s own 20.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Soft's grants concentrate
Soft Machines Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (10 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2015. By volume, Soft sits between Sica S.P.A. and Sortera Technologies, Inc..
Who files at Soft's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Sica S P A
Sica S.P.A.
17 patents
- SIG Services
SIG Services AG
17 patents
- Silex Microsystem…
Silex Microsystems AB
17 patents
- Sipco
Sipco, LLC
17 patents
- Solar Junction
Solar Junction Corporation
17 patents
- Solarlab Aiko Eur…
Solarlab Aiko Europe GMBH
17 patents
- Solco Biomedical
Solco Biomedical Co., Ltd.
17 patents
- Sortera
Sortera Technologies, Inc.
17 patents
- Soft Machines ◀
Soft Machines Inc.
17 patents
What this shows Soft holds 17 patents at rank #17,178, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Soft
By rank, the assignees closest to #17,178 in granted patent volume.
- Sica S.P.A. #17,174 · 17 patents
- SIG Services AG #17,175 · 17 patents
- Silex Microsystems AB #17,176 · 17 patents
- Sipco, LLC #17,177 · 17 patents
- Solar Junction Corporation #17,179 · 17 patents
- Solarlab Aiko Europe GMBH #17,180 · 17 patents
- Solco Biomedical Co., Ltd. #17,181 · 17 patents
- Sortera Technologies, Inc. #17,182 · 17 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Soft's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Soft's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 23rd percentile higher than 23% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 17.6% |
| 2016 | 10 | 58.8% |
| 2017 | 4 | 23.5% |
Which technologies does Soft Machines Inc. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Soft Machines Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Soft Machines Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #17,212 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Soft Machines Inc. against Sica S.P.A., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.