PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Smith Mountain Industries, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2015–2018. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F23D (BURNERS).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
6
Total patents granted
4
CPC technology areas
3.0
Avg claims per patent
-100%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Smith holds 6 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #43,285 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#43,285
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 97%
by Innovation Score (15.6/100)
3.0
avg claims per patent
-100%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Smith Mountain Industries, Inc. has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2015 and 2018, placing Smith Mountain Industries, Inc. at rank #43,285 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 3.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in F23D (BURNERS). As a US Corporation, Smith Mountain Industries, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Smith sits between Smart Stabilizer Systems Limited (6 patents, rank #43,281) and Soctronics, Inc. (6 patents, rank #43,289) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 15.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 6 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Smith Mountain Industries, Inc.'s 3.0 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Smith Mountain Industries, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

Who files at Smith's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Smith holds 6 patents at rank #43,285, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Smith

By rank, the assignees closest to #43,285 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F23D (Burners)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Smith's primary technology class.

Smith's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

16 Top 97% higher than 3% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). This entry sits in this band. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Above this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Above this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.5 2015201620172018 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2018

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Smith Mountain Industries, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 2 33.3%
2016 2 33.3%
2017 1 16.7%
2018 1 16.7%

Which technologies does Smith Mountain Industries, Inc. patent most?

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Specialized
Claim Depth Simple
Velocity Declining

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#43,285

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

15.6 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Smith Mountain Industries, Inc. hold?
Smith Mountain Industries, Inc. holds 6 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2018, spanning 4 technology areas.
What is Smith Mountain Industries, Inc.'s Innovation Score?
Smith Mountain Industries, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 15.6 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Smith Mountain Industries, Inc. focus on?
Smith Mountain Industries, Inc.'s top technology area is F23D (BURNERS) with 2 patents. The company has filed patents in 4 CPC subclasses total.
Is Smith Mountain Industries, Inc.'s patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Smith Mountain Industries, Inc.'s recent filing velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period. Filing activity has slowed relative to earlier years.
What does claim depth mean for Smith Mountain Industries, Inc.'s patents?
Smith Mountain Industries, Inc.'s patents average 3.0 claims each. This is relatively simple claim structure, typical for focused inventions.
How is the Smith Mountain Industries, Inc. patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Smith's 6 grants land it in the top 97% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Smith ranks #43,285 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in F23D - see who else leads that technology area. F23D leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.