Smartorg, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Smartorg ranks #33,362 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #33,362
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 2nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (13.5/100)
- 4.0
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R33362 · US Corporation #33,362 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #33,362/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Sleep Solutions
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 1 areas
- INNOV-LOW 13.5/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 4.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Sleep Solutions Inc (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Smartorg’s 13.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Smartorg
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Smartorg · this assignee 14
Smartorg · this assignee
14 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Smartorg's Innovation Score is 13.5/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Smartorg?
Each dot is one of Smartorg’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Smartorg’s own 4.0 claims/patent is at or below the 12.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Smartorg's grants concentrate
Smartorg, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 12.5% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). By volume, Smartorg sits between Sleep Solutions Inc and SO Spark Ltd..
Who files at Smartorg's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Sleep Solutions
Sleep Solutions Inc
8 patents
- Slice Engineering
Slice Engineering LLC
8 patents
- Slis
Slis, Inc.
8 patents
- Smart Picture
Smart Picture Technologies, Inc.
8 patents
- Smiths Interconne…
Smiths Interconnect, Inc.
8 patents
- Smpl
Smpl Inc
8 patents
- Snap Cpap
Snap Cpap, LLC
8 patents
- SO Spark
SO Spark Ltd.
8 patents
- Smartorg ◀
Smartorg, Inc.
8 patents
What this shows Smartorg holds 8 patents at rank #33,234, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Smartorg
By rank, the assignees closest to #33,234 in granted patent volume.
- Sleep Solutions Inc #33,230 · 8 patents
- Slice Engineering LLC #33,231 · 8 patents
- Slis, Inc. #33,232 · 8 patents
- Smart Picture Technologies, Inc. #33,233 · 8 patents
- Smiths Interconnect, Inc. #33,235 · 8 patents
- Smpl Inc #33,236 · 8 patents
- Snap Cpap, LLC #33,237 · 8 patents
- SO Spark Ltd. #33,238 · 8 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Smartorg's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Smartorg's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
14 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2018 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 25.0% |
Which technologies does Smartorg, Inc. patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Smartorg, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Smartorg, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 12.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #33,362 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Smartorg, Inc. against Sleep Solutions Inc, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 13.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.