Smart Lifts, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B66B (ELEVATORS; Escalators OR Moving Walkways).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Smart ranks #33,358 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #33,358
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 24th percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.6/100)
- 25.5
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R33358 · US Corporation #33,358 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #33,358/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Skymedi
- CPC-NARROW B66B · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.6/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 25.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Skymedi Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Smart’s 27.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Smart
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Smart Lifts · this assignee 28
Smart Lifts · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Smart's Innovation Score is 27.6/100 (24th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Smart?
Each dot is one of Smart’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Smart’s own 25.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Smart's grants concentrate
Smart Lifts, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B66B (ELEVATORS; Escalators OR Moving Walkways). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Smart sits between Skymedi Corporation and Smartthings, Inc..
Who files at Smart's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Skymedi
Skymedi Corporation
8 patents
- Skyport Systems
Skyport Systems, Inc.
8 patents
- Sleepme
Sleepme Inc.
8 patents
- Smart Billiard Li…
Smart Billiard Lighting LLC
8 patents
- Smart Vision Labs
Smart Vision Labs, Inc.
8 patents
- Smartisan Digital
Smartisan Digital Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- Smartsheet
Smartsheet Inc.
8 patents
- Smartthings
Smartthings, Inc.
8 patents
- Smart Lifts ◀
Smart Lifts, LLC
8 patents
What this shows Smart holds 8 patents at rank #33,416, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Smart
By rank, the assignees closest to #33,416 in granted patent volume.
- Skymedi Corporation #33,412 · 8 patents
- Skyport Systems, Inc. #33,413 · 8 patents
- Sleepme Inc. #33,414 · 8 patents
- Smart Billiard Lighting LLC #33,415 · 8 patents
- Smart Vision Labs, Inc. #33,417 · 8 patents
- Smartisan Digital Co., Ltd. #33,418 · 8 patents
- Smartsheet Inc. #33,419 · 8 patents
- Smartthings, Inc. #33,420 · 8 patents
Leaders in B66B (Elevators)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Smart's primary technology class.
- Otis Elevator Company 1,225 in class
- Kone Corporation 590 in class
- Inventio AG 475 in class
- thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation 75 in class
- thyssenkrupp AG 39 in class
- TK Elevator Innovation and Operations GmbH 32 in class
- China University of Mining and Technology 31 in class
- Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. 26 in class
Smart's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 24th percentile higher than 24% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2016 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2017 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2019 | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Smart Lifts, LLC patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Smart Lifts, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Smart Lifts, LLC's lead technology class is B66B (ELEVATORS; Escalators OR Moving Walkways), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B66B
- Ranked #33,358 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Smart Lifts, LLC against Skymedi Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.