Where does Siteimprove A/S rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Siteimprove A/S ranks #11,438 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Siteimprove A/S hold?

Siteimprove A/S holds 27 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2025, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is Siteimprove A/S's Innovation Score?

Siteimprove A/S has an Innovation Score of 46.2 out of 100 (top 21% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Siteimprove A/S focus on?

Siteimprove A/S's top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 22 patents, ranking #1,890 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

Is Siteimprove A/S's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Siteimprove A/S.

What does claim depth mean for Siteimprove A/S's patents?

Siteimprove A/S's patents average 16.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Siteimprove A/S patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Siteimprove A/S

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 27 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Siteimprove ranks #11,438 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 27 patents across 2 technology areas.

#11,438
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 21%
by Innovation Score (46.2/100): 16.1
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R11438 · Foreign Corporation #11,438 · 27 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-SMALL 27 grants
UPPER-Q #11,438/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Series International
CPC-NARROW G06F · 2 areas
INNOV-PAR 46.2/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.1 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Series International, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Siteimprove’s 46.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.5 pts (25%) Velocity 20.0 pts (43%) Breadth 5.0 pts (11%) Claim depth 9.7 pts (21%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
A G Stacker · near

46
Compugen · near

46
Datamax-O'Neil · near

46
Siteimprove A/S · this assignee

46
Verdesian Life… · near

46
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Siteimprove's Innovation Score is 46.2/100 (top 21% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Siteimprove?

Each dot is one of Siteimprove’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Siteimprove’s own 16.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Siteimprove vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Siteimprove's grants concentrate

Siteimprove A/S is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 81.5% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (8 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2020. By volume, Siteimprove sits between Series International, LLC and Sparq Systems Inc..

Siteimprove's three-year grant acceleration

Siteimprove A/S shows 19 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Series Internatio…

27
Siemens Canada

27
Siliconch Systems…

27
Simple Living Sol…

27
Sky CP

27
Snik

27
Southern Imperial

27
Sparq Systems

27
Siteimprove A/S ◀

27

What this shows Siteimprove holds 27 patents at rank #11,445, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Siteimprove

By rank, the assignees closest to #11,445 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Siteimprove's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Siteimprove, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), Siteimprove ranks #1,890 of 13,878 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (46 here).

Verdesian Life Sciences U.S., LLC 46 A. G. Stacker Inc. 46 Compugen Ltd. 46 Datamax-O'Neil Corporation 46

Siteimprove's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

46 Top 21% higher than 79% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Siteimprove A/S patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	2	7.4%
2021	3	11.1%
2022	5	18.5%
2023	8	29.6%
2024	6	22.2%
2025partial year	3	11.1%

Which technologies does Siteimprove A/S patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 22

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 7

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Siteimprove A/S's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Siteimprove A/S's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 81.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #11,438 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Siteimprove A/S against Series International, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 46.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.