Simbol, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 18 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C22B (Production AND Refining OF Metals ; Pretreatment OF RAW Materials).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Simbol ranks #25,227 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 18 technology areas.
- #25,227
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 45th percentile
- by Innovation Score (33.6/100)
- 16.7
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R25227 · US Corporation #25,227 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
- MID-PACK #25,227/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Signet Health
- CPC-FOCUS C22B · 18 areas
- INNOV-THIN 33.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Signet Health Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Simbol’s 33.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Simbol
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Simbol · this assignee 34
Simbol · this assignee
34 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Simbol's Innovation Score is 33.6/100 (45th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Simbol?
Each dot is one of Simbol’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Simbol’s own 16.7 claims/patent is at or below the 17.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Simbol's grants concentrate
Simbol, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 18 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under C22B (Production AND Refining OF Metals ; Pretreatment OF RAW Materials). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (6 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Simbol sits between Signet Health Corporation and Slash Next, Inc..
Who files at Simbol's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Signet Health
Signet Health Corporation
11 patents
- Signiant
Signiant Inc.
11 patents
- Silicor Materials
Silicor Materials Inc.
11 patents
- Silverside Detect…
Silverside Detectors Inc.
11 patents
- Sintetica
Sintetica S.A.
11 patents
- Skedco
Skedco, Inc.
11 patents
- Skeyeon
Skeyeon, Inc.
11 patents
- Slash Next
Slash Next, Inc.
11 patents
- Simbol ◀
Simbol, Inc.
11 patents
What this shows Simbol holds 11 patents at rank #25,266, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Simbol
By rank, the assignees closest to #25,266 in granted patent volume.
- Signet Health Corporation #25,262 · 11 patents
- Signiant Inc. #25,263 · 11 patents
- Silicor Materials Inc. #25,264 · 11 patents
- Silverside Detectors Inc. #25,265 · 11 patents
- Sintetica S.A. #25,267 · 11 patents
- Skedco, Inc. #25,268 · 11 patents
- Skeyeon, Inc. #25,269 · 11 patents
- Slash Next, Inc. #25,270 · 11 patents
Leaders in C22B (Production AND Refining OF Metals)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Simbol's primary technology class.
- Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. 110 in class
- Outotec (FINLAND) OY 53 in class
- Freeport Minerals Corporation 44 in class
- JX Nippon Mining & Metals Corporation 41 in class
- Molten Metal Equipment Innovations, LLC 37 in class
- Outotec Oyj 30 in class
- Guangdong Brunp Recycling Technology Co., Ltd. 26 in class
- Carbon Technology Holdings, LLC 26 in class
Simbol's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
34 45th percentile higher than 45% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 6 | 54.5% |
| 2016 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2017 | 3 | 27.3% |
Which technologies does Simbol, Inc. patent most?
Top 15 of 18 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Simbol, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Simbol, Inc.'s lead technology class is C22B (Production AND Refining OF Metals ; Pretreatment OF RAW Materials), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C22B
- Ranked #25,227 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Simbol, Inc. against Signet Health Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 33.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.