USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Sigma Phase, Corp.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B01F (Mixing, e.g. Dissolving, Emulsifying OR Dispersing).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Sigma ranks #23,398 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 7 technology areas.

#23,398
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
44th percentile
by Innovation Score (33.2/100)
28.4
avg claims per patent
+200%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R23398 · US Corporation #23,398 · 12 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
  • MID-PACK #23,398/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Shenzhen Zhanpusida…
  • CPC-NARROW B01F · 7 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 33.2/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 28.4 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-SURGE +200% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Shenzhen Zhanpusida Technology Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Sigma’s 33.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Sigma

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Sigma's Innovation Score is 33.2/100 (44th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Sigma?

Each dot is one of Sigma’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Sigma’s own 28.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Sigma vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 11.911.91212.1 51015202530 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Shenzhen Zhanpusida Technology Co., Ltd. - 12, 19.75Shenzhen Zhanpusi…Shin-Kobe Electric Machinery Co., Ltd. - 12, 9.25Shin-kobe Electri…Siemens S.A.S - 12, 16Siemens SSight Machine, Inc. - 12, 20Sight MachineSignum Biosciences, Inc. - 12, 18.58Signum BiosciencesSilergy Corp. - 12, 16.67SilergySilicate Studio Home, LLC - 12, 11.92Silicate Studio H…Sinher Technology Inc. - 12, 11.67Sinher TechnologySigma Phase, Corp. - 12, 28.42Sigma Phase
Sigma vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Sigma's grants concentrate

Sigma Phase, Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B01F (Mixing, e.g. Dissolving, Emulsifying OR Dispersing). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (7 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2021. By volume, Sigma sits between Shenzhen Zhanpusida Technology Co., Ltd. and Sinher Technology Inc..

Who files at Sigma's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Sigma holds 12 patents at rank #23,442, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Sigma

By rank, the assignees closest to #23,442 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B01F (Mixing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Sigma's primary technology class.

Sigma's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 44th percentile higher than 44% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 201920202021 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Sigma Phase, Corp. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2019 3 25.0%
2020 7 58.3%
2021 2 16.7%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Sigma Phase, Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Sigma Phase, Corp.'s lead technology class is B01F (Mixing, e.g. Dissolving, Emulsifying OR Dispersing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B01F
  • Ranked #23,398 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Sigma Phase, Corp. against Shenzhen Zhanpusida Technology Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 33.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.