Siebel Systems, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2016. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Siebel ranks #43,087 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #43,087
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 31st percentile
- by Innovation Score (29.6/100)
- 30.8
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R43087 · US Corporation #43,087 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #43,087/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Sichuan Jamie…
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 29.6/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 30.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Sichuan Jamie Charming Technology Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Siebel’s 29.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Siebel
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Siebel Systems · this assignee 30
Siebel Systems · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Siebel's Innovation Score is 29.6/100 (31st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Siebel?
Each dot is one of Siebel’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Siebel’s own 30.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Siebel's grants concentrate
Siebel Systems, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Siebel sits between Sichuan Jamie Charming Technology Co., Ltd. and SightGlass Vision, Inc..
Who files at Siebel's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Sichuan Jamie Cha…
Sichuan Jamie Charming Technology Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Sichuan Topfire T…
Sichuan Topfire Technology Co., Ltd
6 patents
- Sichuan Xieming T…
Sichuan Xieming Technology Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Sideassure
SideAssure, Inc.
6 patents
- Siemens Healtchare
Siemens Healtchare GmbH
6 patents
- Siemens Heathcare
Siemens Heathcare GmbH
6 patents
- Sigelock Systems
Sigelock Systems, LLC
6 patents
- Sightglass Vision
SightGlass Vision, Inc.
6 patents
- Siebel Systems ◀
Siebel Systems, Inc.
6 patents
What this shows Siebel holds 6 patents at rank #43,238, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Siebel
By rank, the assignees closest to #43,238 in granted patent volume.
- Sichuan Jamie Charming Technology Co., Ltd. #43,234 · 6 patents
- Sichuan Topfire Technology Co., Ltd #43,235 · 6 patents
- Sichuan Xieming Technology Co., Ltd. #43,236 · 6 patents
- SideAssure, Inc. #43,237 · 6 patents
- Siemens Healtchare GmbH #43,239 · 6 patents
- Siemens Heathcare GmbH #43,240 · 6 patents
- Sigelock Systems, LLC #43,241 · 6 patents
- SightGlass Vision, Inc. #43,242 · 6 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Siebel's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Siebel's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 31st percentile higher than 31% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 66.7% |
| 2016 | 2 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does Siebel Systems, Inc. patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Siebel Systems, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Siebel Systems, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #43,087 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Siebel Systems, Inc. against Sichuan Jamie Charming Technology Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 29.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.