USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Sick Engineering GMBH

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 25 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01F (Measuring Volume, Volume Flow, Mass Flow OR Liquid LEVEL; Metering BY Volume).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Sick ranks #12,223 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 25 patents across 12 technology areas.

#12,223
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 47%
by Innovation Score (36.1/100)
12.3
avg claims per patent
-21%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R12223 · Foreign Corporation #12,223 · 25 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 25 grants
  • UPPER-Q #12,223/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Shenzhen Puremate…
  • CPC-FOCUS G01F · 12 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 36.1/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 12.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DOWN -21% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Shenzhen Puremate Technology Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Sick’s 36.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Sick

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Sick's Innovation Score is 36.1/100 (top 47% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Sick?

Each dot is one of Sick’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Sick’s own 12.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Sick vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 24.924.92525.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Shenzhen Puremate Technology Co., Ltd. - 25, 1Shenzhen Puremate…Shenzhen S-hande Technology Co., Ltd. - 25, 2.52Shenzhen S-hande…Shenzhen Xingyingda Industry Co., Ltd - 25, 1Shenzhen Xingying…Shinmaywa Industries, Ltd. - 25, 8.96Shinmaywa Industr…Sightful Computers Ltd - 25, 20Sightful ComputersSilvergate Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - 25, 21.64Silvergate Pharma…Skyworks Panasonic Filter Solutions Japan Co., Ltd. - 25, 20.68Skyworks Panasoni…Smic New Technology Research and Development (Shanghai) Corporation - 25, 15.12Smic New Technolo…Sick Engineering GMBH - 25, 12.28Sick Engineering
Sick vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Sick's grants concentrate

Sick Engineering GMBH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 72% of grants classified under G01F (Measuring Volume, Volume Flow, Mass Flow OR Liquid LEVEL; Metering BY Volume). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (5 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Sick sits between Shenzhen Puremate Technology Co., Ltd. and Smic New Technology Research and Development (Shanghai) Corporation.

Sick's three-year grant acceleration

Sick Engineering GMBH shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 9 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Sick's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Sick holds 25 patents at rank #12,212, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Sick

By rank, the assignees closest to #12,212 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G01F (Measuring Volume)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Sick's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Sick, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G01F (Measuring Volume), Sick ranks #47 of 1,205 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (36 here).

Sick's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

36 Top 47% higher than 53% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

123456 20162017201820192020202220232024 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Sick Engineering GMBH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 2 8.0%
2017 4 16.0%
2018 3 12.0%
2019 5 20.0%
2020 4 16.0%
2022 2 8.0%
2023 3 12.0%
2024 2 8.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Sick Engineering GMBH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Sick Engineering GMBH's lead technology class is G01F (Measuring Volume, Volume Flow, Mass Flow OR Liquid LEVEL; Metering BY Volume), 72% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01F
  • Ranked #12,223 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Sick Engineering GMBH against Shenzhen Puremate Technology Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 36.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.