Overall rank by patents
#37,435
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Shanghai ranks #37,435 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 3 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R37435 · Foreign Corporation #37,435 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Shamrock International Fastener LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Shanghai Golden… · this assignee
35 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Shanghai's Innovation Score is 35.0/100 (49th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Shanghai Golden Leaf MED TEC Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Shanghai sits between Shamrock International Fastener LLC and Shanghai Kinbio TECH.CO., Ltd..
Shanghai Golden Leaf MED TEC Co., Ltd. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Shamrock International Fastener LLC
7 patents
Shanghai Conant Optical Co., Ltd
7 patents
Shanghai DE Novo Pharmatech Co., Ltd.
7 patents
Shanghai Energy NEW Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
7 patents
Shanghai Hongchen Household Wares Co., Ltd.
7 patents
Shanghai Integrated Circuit Equipment & Materials Industry Innovation Center Co., Ltd
7 patents
Shanghai Jinzhao Energy Saving Technology Co., Ltd.
7 patents
Shanghai Kinbio TECH.CO., Ltd.
7 patents
Shanghai Golden Leaf MED TEC Co., Ltd.
7 patents
What this shows Shanghai holds 7 patents at rank #37,364, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #37,364 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Shanghai's primary technology class.
Shanghai's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
35 49th percentile higher than 49% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2022 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2024 | 2 | 28.6% |
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#37,435
of 49,997 tracked assignees
35.0 out of 100
What to do with this data
Shanghai Golden Leaf MED TEC Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.