USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Ses-imagotag

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 31 granted patents across 15 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G09G (ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION).

31
Total patents granted
15
CPC technology areas
11.6
Avg claims per patent
+243%
5-year grant velocity

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Ses-imagotag ranks #10,172 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 31 patents across 15 technology areas.

#10,172
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 37%
by Innovation Score (39.8/100)
11.6
avg claims per patent
+243%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Ses-imagotag has been granted 31 US utility patents between 2018 and 2024, placing Ses-imagotag at #10,172 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 15 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 11.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in G09G (ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION). As a Foreign Corporation, Ses-imagotag is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Ses-imagotag sits between Samyang Biopharmaceuticals Corporation (31 patents, rank #10,163) and Siemens Energy AS (31 patents, rank #10,171) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 39.8/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 24 grants, compared with 7 in the 2015–2019 window, a +243% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The Foreign Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.

Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Ses-imagotag's 11.6 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 15 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.

Who files at Ses-imagotag's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Ses-imagotag holds 31 patents at rank #10,167, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Ses-imagotag

By rank, the assignees closest to #10,167 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G09G (Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Device…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Ses-imagotag's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Ses-imagotag, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Ses-imagotag's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

40 Top 37% higher than 63% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

1234567 2018201920202021202220232024 6
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Ses-imagotag patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2018 2 6.5%
2019 5 16.1%
2020 6 19.4%
2021 3 9.7%
2022 3 9.7%
2023 6 19.4%
2024 6 19.4%

Which technologies does Ses-imagotag patent most?

Top 15 of 15 technology areas

Grant record at a glance

Portfolio Volume 31 grants
CPC subclasses 15
Avg. claims / grant 11.6
Velocity +243%

Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#10,172

of 50,000 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

39.8 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does Ses-imagotag rank among US patent assignees?
According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Ses-imagotag ranks #10,172 of 50,000 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.
How many patents does Ses-imagotag hold?
Ses-imagotag holds 31 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2024, spanning 15 technology areas.
What is Ses-imagotag's Innovation Score?
Ses-imagotag has an Innovation Score of 39.8 out of 100 (top 37% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Ses-imagotag focus on?
Ses-imagotag's top technology area is G09G (ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION) with 13 patents. Grants appear in 15 CPC subclasses total.
Is Ses-imagotag's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?
Ses-imagotag's recent grant velocity is +243% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.
What does claim depth mean for Ses-imagotag's patents?
Ses-imagotag's patents average 11.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.
How is the Ses-imagotag patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Ses-imagotag's 31 grants land it in the top 37% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Ses-imagotag ranks #10,172 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in G09G - see who else leads that technology area. G09G leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.