Where does Sequitur Labs, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Sequitur Labs, Inc. ranks #19,129 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Sequitur Labs, Inc. hold?

Sequitur Labs, Inc. holds 15 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2023, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Sequitur Labs, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Sequitur Labs, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 23.8 out of 100 (13th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Sequitur Labs, Inc. focus on?

Sequitur Labs, Inc.'s top technology area is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication) with 15 patents, ranking #1,732 of 8,956 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is Sequitur Labs, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Sequitur Labs, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +14% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Sequitur Labs, Inc.'s patents?

Sequitur Labs, Inc.'s patents average 12.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Sequitur Labs, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Sequitur Labs, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 15 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Sequitur ranks #19,129 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 15 patents across 3 technology areas.

#19,129
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 13th percentile
by Innovation Score (23.8/100): 12.4
avg claims per patent: +14%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R19129 · US Corporation #19,129 · 15 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 15 grants
MID-PACK #19,129/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Sckipio S I
CPC-NARROW H04L · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 23.8/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.4 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-UP +14% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Sckipio Technologies S.I Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Sequitur’s 23.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.6 pts (40%) Velocity 0.7 pts (3%) Breadth 6.1 pts (26%) Claim depth 7.4 pts (31%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Sequitur Labs · this assignee

24
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Sequitur's Innovation Score is 23.8/100 (13th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Sequitur?

Each dot is one of Sequitur’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Sequitur’s own 12.4 claims/patent is at or below the 15.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Sequitur vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Sequitur's grants concentrate

Sequitur Labs, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Sequitur sits between Sckipio Technologies S.I Ltd. and Sharp Fukuyama Laser Co., Ltd..

Sequitur's three-year grant acceleration

Sequitur Labs, Inc. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 10 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Sckipio S I

15
Scythe Robotics

15
Seismic Holdings

15
Sensys Networks

15
Serina Therapeuti…

15
Shanghai Institut…

15
Shanghai Syncores

15
Sharp Fukuyama La…

15
Sequitur Labs ◀

15

What this shows Sequitur holds 15 patents at rank #19,156, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Sequitur

By rank, the assignees closest to #19,156 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Sequitur's primary technology class.

Sequitur's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 13th percentile higher than 13% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Sequitur Labs, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	6.7%
2017	1	6.7%
2018	2	13.3%
2019	3	20.0%
2020	5	33.3%
2021	2	13.3%
2023	1	6.7%

Which technologies does Sequitur Labs, Inc. patent most?

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 15

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 13

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 6

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Sequitur Labs, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Sequitur Labs, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
Ranked #19,129 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Sequitur Labs, Inc. against Sckipio Technologies S.I Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 23.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.