Where does Semantic Compaction Systems Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Semantic Compaction Systems Inc. ranks #37,402 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Semantic Compaction Systems Inc. hold?

Semantic Compaction Systems Inc. holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2016, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is Semantic Compaction Systems Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Semantic Compaction Systems Inc. has an Innovation Score of 30.1 out of 100 (33rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Semantic Compaction Systems Inc. focus on?

Semantic Compaction Systems Inc.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 7 patents, ranking #4,773 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is Semantic Compaction Systems Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Semantic Compaction Systems Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Semantic Compaction Systems Inc.'s patents?

Semantic Compaction Systems Inc.'s patents average 44.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Semantic Compaction Systems Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Semantic Compaction Systems Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2016. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Semantic ranks #37,402 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 5 technology areas.

#37,402
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 33rd percentile
by Innovation Score (30.1/100): 44.0
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R37402 · US Corporation #37,402 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
MID-PACK #37,402/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Sekisui Techno Molding
CPC-NARROW G06F · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 30.1/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 44.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Sekisui Techno Molding Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Semantic’s 30.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (24%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 7.9 pts (26%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (50%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Semantic Compaction… · this assignee

30
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Semantic's Innovation Score is 30.1/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Semantic?

Each dot is one of Semantic’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Semantic’s own 44.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Semantic vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Semantic's grants concentrate

Semantic Compaction Systems Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2015. By volume, Semantic sits between Sekisui Techno Molding Co., Ltd. and Sensor Networks, Inc..

Sekisui Techno Mo…

7
Selectron Systems

7
Seleggt

7
Selle Italia S R L

7
Semiconductor Dis…

7
Semperit Aktienge…

7
Senseor

7
Sensor Networks

7
Semantic Compacti… ◀

7

What this shows Semantic holds 7 patents at rank #37,343, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Semantic

By rank, the assignees closest to #37,343 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Semantic's primary technology class.

Semantic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2016

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Semantic Compaction Systems Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	42.9%
2016	4	57.1%

Which technologies does Semantic Compaction Systems Inc. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 7

G09G - Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Devices Using Static Means TO Present Variable Information 6

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 6

G10L - Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding 1

G09B - Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Semantic Compaction Systems Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Semantic Compaction Systems Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #37,402 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Semantic Compaction Systems Inc. against Sekisui Techno Molding Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.