Where does Scott Cutters Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Scott Cutters Limited ranks #25,144 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Scott Cutters Limited hold?

Scott Cutters Limited holds 11 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2024, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is Scott Cutters Limited's Innovation Score?

Scott Cutters Limited has an Innovation Score of 33.6 out of 100 (45th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Scott Cutters Limited focus on?

Scott Cutters Limited's top technology area is E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors) with 2 patents, ranking #275 of 584 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is Scott Cutters Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Scott Cutters Limited's recent grant velocity is -78% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Scott Cutters Limited's patents?

Scott Cutters Limited's patents average 6.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Scott Cutters Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Scott Cutters Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Scott ranks #25,144 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 5 technology areas.

#25,144
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 45th percentile
by Innovation Score (33.6/100): 6.3
avg claims per patent: -78%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R25144 · Foreign Corporation #25,144 · 11 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
MID-PACK #25,144/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Sato Pharmaceutical
CPC-NARROW E04F · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 33.6/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.3 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -78% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Sato Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Scott’s 33.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.6 pts (26%) Velocity 13.3 pts (40%) Breadth 7.9 pts (24%) Claim depth 3.8 pts (11%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Scott Cutters · this assignee

34
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Scott's Innovation Score is 33.6/100 (45th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Scott?

Each dot is one of Scott’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Scott’s own 6.3 claims/patent is at or below the 18.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Scott vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Scott's grants concentrate

Scott Cutters Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 18.2% of grants classified under E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Scott sits between Sato Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Sekisui Specialty Chemicals America, LLC.

Scott's three-year grant acceleration

Scott Cutters Limited shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Sato Pharmaceutic…

11
Sauder Woodworking

11
Schottky LSI

11
Sciperio

11
Scripps Networks…

11
Seiko PMC

11
Sejin-igb

11
Sekisui Specialty…

11
Scott Cutters ◀

11

What this shows Scott holds 11 patents at rank #25,118, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Scott

By rank, the assignees closest to #25,118 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Scott's primary technology class.

Scott's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 45th percentile higher than 45% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Scott Cutters Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	9.1%
2016	3	27.3%
2017	1	9.1%
2018	3	27.3%
2019	1	9.1%
2024	2	18.2%

Which technologies does Scott Cutters Limited patent most?

E04F - Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors 2

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

B24D - Tools FOR Grinding, Buffing OR Sharpening 1

B23D - PLANING; SLOTTING; SHEARING; BROACHING; SAWING; FILING; SCRAPING; Like Operations FOR Working Metal BY Removing Material, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

B26D - CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Scott Cutters Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Scott Cutters Limited's lead technology class is E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors), 18.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E04F
Ranked #25,144 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Scott Cutters Limited against Sato Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 33.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.