PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Schenck Process Europe Gmbh

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 17 granted patents across 16 technology areas, active 2018–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B65G (TRANSPORT OR STORAGE DEVICES, e.g. CONVEYORS FOR LOADING OR TIPPING, SHOP CONVEYOR SYSTEMS OR PNEUMATIC TUBE CONVEYORS).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
17
Total patents granted
16
CPC technology areas
15.0
Avg claims per patent
+367%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Schenck holds 17 US patents across 16 technology areas, rank #17,204 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#17,204
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 24%
by Innovation Score (45.1/100)
15.0
avg claims per patent
+367%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Schenck Process Europe GmbH has been granted 17 US utility patents between 2018 and 2025, placing Schenck Process Europe GmbH at rank #17,204 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 16 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 15.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in B65G (TRANSPORT OR STORAGE DEVICES, e.g. CONVEYORS FOR LOADING OR TIPPING, SHOP CONVEYOR SYSTEMS OR PNEUMATIC TUBE CONVEYORS). As a Foreign Corporation, Schenck Process Europe GmbH is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. The composite Innovation Score of 45.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 14 grants, compared with 3 in the 2015–2019 window, a +367% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Schenck Process Europe GmbH's 15.0 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 16 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Schenck Process Europe GmbH against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

How does Schenck compare?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus the largest corporate holders, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Schenck holds 17 patents, placing it at rank #17,204 overall, well behind the volume leaders but ahead of the tens of thousands of smaller assignees in the dataset.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Schenck's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

45 Top 24% higher than 76% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2025

012345 20182019202020212022202320242025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Schenck Process Europe GmbH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2018 2 11.8%
2019 1 5.9%
2020 1 5.9%
2021 3 17.6%
2022 4 23.5%
2023 3 17.6%
2024 2 11.8%
2025 1 5.9%

Which technologies does Schenck Process Europe GmbH patent most?

Top 15 of 16 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Focused
Claim Depth Standard
Velocity Accelerating

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#17,204

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

45.1 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Schenck Process Europe GmbH hold?
Schenck Process Europe GmbH holds 17 US granted patents filed between 2018 and 2025, spanning 16 technology areas.
What is Schenck Process Europe GmbH's Innovation Score?
Schenck Process Europe GmbH has an Innovation Score of 45.1 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Schenck Process Europe GmbH focus on?
Schenck Process Europe GmbH's top technology area is B65G (TRANSPORT OR STORAGE DEVICES, e.g. CONVEYORS FOR LOADING OR TIPPING, SHOP CONVEYOR SYSTEMS OR PNEUMATIC TUBE CONVEYORS) with 8 patents. The company has filed patents in 16 CPC subclasses total.
Is Schenck Process Europe GmbH's patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Schenck Process Europe GmbH's recent filing velocity is +367% compared to the prior five-year period. This indicates accelerating innovation.
What does claim depth mean for Schenck Process Europe GmbH's patents?
Schenck Process Europe GmbH's patents average 15.0 claims each. This falls within the standard range, providing solid legal coverage.
How is the Schenck Process Europe GmbH patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

Guides to patent portfolio analysis

How Innovation Score Works

Understand the four dimensions behind the composite score
How to Read Patent Data

Plain-English guide to CPC codes, claims, and metrics
Patent Moat Analysis

How companies use patents as competitive barriers

How to use this portfolio

Schenck's 17 grants land it in the top 24% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Schenck ranks #17,204 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in B65G - see who else leads that technology area. B65G leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Explore the patent dataset

B65G technology

Schenck Process Europe GmbH's primary CPC class, all holders and yearly trends
Top 50 patent holders

See where Schenck Process Europe GmbH ranks among the largest US patent assignees
All technology classes

Browse every CPC technology area by patent activity
How the score works

The four dimensions behind the Innovation Score

Related

All companies → | All technologies → | Rankings →
Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.