Sangenic International Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B65F (Gathering OR Removal OF Domestic OR Like Refuse).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Sangenic ranks #27,305 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #27,305
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 6th percentile
- by Innovation Score (19.3/100)
- 8.2
- avg claims per patent
- -75%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R27305 · Foreign Corporation #27,305 · 10 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
- MID-PACK #27,305/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Sage Science
- CPC-NARROW B65F · 3 areas
- INNOV-LOW 19.3/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 8.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -75% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Sage Science, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Sangenic’s 19.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Sangenic
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Sangenic International · this assignee 19
Sangenic International · this assignee
19 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Sangenic's Innovation Score is 19.3/100 (6th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Sangenic?
Each dot is one of Sangenic’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Sangenic’s own 8.2 claims/patent is at or below the 13.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Sangenic's grants concentrate
Sangenic International Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under B65F (Gathering OR Removal OF Domestic OR Like Refuse). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Sangenic sits between Sage Science, Inc. and Sb-kawasumi Laboratories, Inc..
Who files at Sangenic's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Sage Science
Sage Science, Inc.
10 patents
- Samp S P A CON Un…
Samp S.P.A. CON Unico Socio
10 patents
- Samplix APS
Samplix APS
10 patents
- Sanexen Environme…
Sanexen Environmental Services Inc.
10 patents
- Sanovo Technology…
Sanovo Technology Netherlands B.V.
10 patents
- Sasol Technology…
Sasol Technology (PTY.) Limited
10 patents
- Sauter Feinmechan…
Sauter Feinmechanik GMBH
10 patents
- Sb-kawasumi Labor…
Sb-kawasumi Laboratories, Inc.
10 patents
- Sangenic Internat… ◀
Sangenic International Ltd.
10 patents
What this shows Sangenic holds 10 patents at rank #27,292, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Sangenic
By rank, the assignees closest to #27,292 in granted patent volume.
- Sage Science, Inc. #27,288 · 10 patents
- Samp S.P.A. CON Unico Socio #27,289 · 10 patents
- Samplix APS #27,290 · 10 patents
- Sanexen Environmental Services Inc. #27,291 · 10 patents
- Sanovo Technology Netherlands B.V. #27,293 · 10 patents
- Sasol Technology (PTY.) Limited #27,294 · 10 patents
- Sauter Feinmechanik GMBH #27,295 · 10 patents
- Sb-kawasumi Laboratories, Inc. #27,296 · 10 patents
Leaders in B65F (Gathering OR Removal OF Domestic OR Like Refuse)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Sangenic's primary technology class.
Sangenic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
19 6th percentile higher than 6% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 30.0% |
| 2016 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2020 | 2 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Sangenic International Ltd. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Sangenic International Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Sangenic International Ltd.'s lead technology class is B65F (Gathering OR Removal OF Domestic OR Like Refuse), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B65F
- Ranked #27,305 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Sangenic International Ltd. against Sage Science, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 19.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.