Safe-T-Pull, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A01D (HARVESTING; Mowing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Safe-t-pull ranks #27,296 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #27,296
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 34th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.3/100)
- 19.1
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R27296 · US Corporation #27,296 · 10 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
- MID-PACK #27,296/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Samhongsa
- CPC-NARROW A01D · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Samhongsa Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Safe-t-pull’s 30.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Safe-t-pull
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Safe-T-Pull · this assignee 30
Safe-T-Pull · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Safe-t-pull's Innovation Score is 30.3/100 (34th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Safe-t-pull?
Each dot is one of Safe-t-pull’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Safe-t-pull’s own 19.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Safe-t-pull's grants concentrate
Safe-T-Pull, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 70% of grants classified under A01D (HARVESTING; Mowing). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Safe-t-pull sits between Syng, Inc. and Sandpiper CDN, LLC.
Safe-t-pull's three-year grant acceleration
Safe-T-Pull, Inc. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Safe-T-Pull's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Syng
Syng, Inc.
10 patents
- Synthesis Energy…
Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc.
10 patents
- Synthorx
Synthorx, Inc.
10 patents
- Syrius Robotics
Syrius Robotics Co., Ltd.
10 patents
- Samhongsa
Samhongsa Co., Ltd.
10 patents
- Sand 9
Sand 9, Inc.
10 patents
- Sandmarc
Sandmarc, LLC
10 patents
- Sandpiper CDN
Sandpiper CDN, LLC
10 patents
- Safe-t-pull ◀
Safe-T-Pull, Inc.
10 patents
What this shows Safe-T-Pull holds 10 patents at rank #27,414, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Safe-T-Pull
By rank, the assignees closest to #27,414 in granted patent volume.
- Syng, Inc. #27,410 · 10 patents
- Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. #27,411 · 10 patents
- Synthorx, Inc. #27,412 · 10 patents
- Syrius Robotics Co., Ltd. #27,413 · 10 patents
- Samhongsa Co., Ltd. #27,415 · 10 patents
- Sand 9, Inc. #27,416 · 10 patents
- Sandmarc, LLC #27,417 · 10 patents
- Sandpiper CDN, LLC #27,418 · 10 patents
Leaders in A01D (Harvesting)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Safe-T-Pull's primary technology class.
Safe-t-pull's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 34th percentile higher than 34% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 3 | 30.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 10.0% |
Which technologies does Safe-T-Pull, Inc. patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Safe-T-Pull, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Safe-T-Pull, Inc.'s lead technology class is A01D (HARVESTING; Mowing), 70% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A01D
- Ranked #27,296 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Safe-T-Pull, Inc. against Syng, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.