Where does Run Them Sweet LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Run Them Sweet LLC ranks #17,142 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Run Them Sweet LLC hold?

Run Them Sweet LLC holds 17 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2021, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is Run Them Sweet LLC's Innovation Score?

Run Them Sweet LLC has an Innovation Score of 33.6 out of 100 (45th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Run Them Sweet LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Run Them Sweet LLC's recent grant velocity is -69% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Run Them Sweet LLC's patents?

Run Them Sweet LLC's patents average 58.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Run Them Sweet LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Run Them Sweet LLC

Q: What technology areas does Run Them Sweet LLC focus on?

Run Them Sweet LLC's top technology area is A23L (Foods, Foodstuffs OR Non-alcoholic Beverages, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Preparation OR Treatment Thereof) with 17 patents, ranking #80 of 1,325 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 17 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A23L (Foods, Foodstuffs OR Non-alcoholic Beverages, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Preparation OR Treatment Thereof).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Run ranks #17,142 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 17 patents across 6 technology areas.

#17,142
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 45th percentile
by Innovation Score (33.6/100): 58.1
avg claims per patent: -69%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R17142 · US Corporation #17,142 · 17 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 17 grants
MID-PACK #17,142/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Rose Plastic
CPC-NARROW A23L · 6 areas
INNOV-THIN 33.6/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 58.1 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -69% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Rose Plastic AG (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Run’s 33.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.0 pts (30%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 8.7 pts (26%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (45%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Run Them Sweet · this assignee

34
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Run's Innovation Score is 33.6/100 (45th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Run?

Each dot is one of Run’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Run’s own 58.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Run vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Run's grants concentrate

Run Them Sweet LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A23L (Foods, Foodstuffs OR Non-alcoholic Beverages, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Preparation OR Treatment Thereof). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Run sits between Rose Plastic AG and Saft America.

Rose Plastic

17
Ross Technology

17
Rovi Solutions

17
Rox Medical

17
S M E Products

17
Sacmi Imola S C

17
Safekey Engineeri…

17
Saft America

17
Run Them Sweet ◀

17

What this shows Run holds 17 patents at rank #17,140, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Run

By rank, the assignees closest to #17,140 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A23L (Foods)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Run's primary technology class.

Run's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 45th percentile higher than 45% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Run Them Sweet LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	5.9%
2016	2	11.8%
2017	3	17.6%
2018	6	35.3%
2019	1	5.9%
2020	1	5.9%
2021	3	17.6%

Which technologies does Run Them Sweet LLC patent most?

A23L - Foods, Foodstuffs OR Non-alcoholic Beverages, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Preparation OR Treatment Thereof 17

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 17

A61K - Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes 16

A61P - Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Medicinal Preparations 9

A23V - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Foods, Foodstuffs OR Non-alcoholic Beverages AND Lactic OR Propionic Acid Bacteria Used IN Foodstuffs OR Food Preparation 9

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 9

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Run Them Sweet LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Run Them Sweet LLC's lead technology class is A23L (Foods, Foodstuffs OR Non-alcoholic Beverages, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Preparation OR Treatment Thereof), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A23L
Ranked #17,142 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Run Them Sweet LLC against Rose Plastic AG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 33.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.