Where does Roto-die Company, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Roto-die Company, Inc. ranks #37,278 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Roto-die Company, Inc. hold?

Roto-die Company, Inc. holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2021, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is Roto-die Company, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Roto-die Company, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 24.1 out of 100 (14th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Roto-die Company, Inc. focus on?

Roto-die Company, Inc.'s top technology area is B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing) with 5 patents, ranking #74 of 595 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

Is Roto-die Company, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Roto-die Company, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -25% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Roto-die Company, Inc.'s patents?

Roto-die Company, Inc.'s patents average 13.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Roto-die Company, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Roto-die Company, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Roto-die ranks #37,278 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 6 technology areas.

#37,278
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 14th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.1/100): 13.7
avg claims per patent: -25%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R37278 · US Corporation #37,278 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
MID-PACK #37,278/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH RL Industry
CPC-NARROW B26D · 6 areas
INNOV-THIN 24.1/100
CLAIMS-RICH 13.7 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -25% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: RL Industry Company Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Roto-die’s 24.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (30%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 8.7 pts (36%) Claim depth 8.2 pts (34%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Roto-die · this assignee

24
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Roto-die's Innovation Score is 24.1/100 (14th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Roto-die?

Each dot is one of Roto-die’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Roto-die’s own 13.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Roto-die vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Roto-die's grants concentrate

Roto-die Company, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 71.4% of grants classified under B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Roto-die sits between RL Industry Company Ltd. and RPC Superfos A/S.

RL Industry

7
RMZ Development

7
Robert Bosch Star…

7
Rosecroft Compone…

7
Roto-frank OF Ame…

7
Rototest Internat…

7
Route1

7
RPC Superfos A/S

7
Roto-die ◀

7

What this shows Roto-die holds 7 patents at rank #37,185, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Roto-die

By rank, the assignees closest to #37,185 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B26D (Cutting)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Roto-die's primary technology class.

Roto-die's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 14th percentile higher than 14% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Roto-die Company, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	2	28.6%
2019	2	28.6%
2020	1	14.3%
2021	2	28.6%

Which technologies does Roto-die Company, Inc. patent most?

B26D - CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing 5

B26F - PERFORATING; PUNCHING; CUTTING-OUT; STAMPING-OUT; Severing BY Means Other Than Cutting 3

F16H - Gearing 2

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 2

B23P - Metal-working NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Combined OPERATIONS; Universal Machine Tools 1

F16C - SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings 1

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Roto-die Company, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Roto-die Company, Inc.'s lead technology class is B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing), 71.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B26D
Ranked #37,278 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Roto-die Company, Inc. against RL Industry Company Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 24.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.