Robert Bürkle GmbH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B05B (Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Robert ranks #42,703 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 9 technology areas.
- #42,703
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 14%
- by Innovation Score (49.8/100)
- 20.8
- avg claims per patent
- +100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R42703 · Foreign Corporation #42,703 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #42,703/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Risi Stone
- CPC-NARROW B05B · 9 areas
- INNOV-PAR 49.8/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Risi Stone Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Robert’s 49.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Robert
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Robert Bürkle · this assignee
Robert Bürkle · this assignee
50 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Robert's Innovation Score is 49.8/100 (top 14% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Robert?
Each dot is one of Robert’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Robert’s own 20.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Robert's grants concentrate
Robert Bürkle GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under B05B (Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Robert sits between Risi Stone Inc. and Robust AI, Inc..
Robert's three-year grant acceleration
Robert Bürkle GmbH shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Robert's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Risi Stone
Risi Stone Inc.
6 patents
- Ritter
Ritter GmbH
6 patents
- Robby Galletta En…
Robby Galletta Enterprises LLC
6 patents
- Robell Research
Robell Research, Inc.
6 patents
- Robert F Nienhous…
Robert F. Nienhouse 1997 Declaration of Trust
6 patents
- Robo Industries
Robo Industries, Inc.
6 patents
- Robson Forensic
Robson Forensic, Inc.
6 patents
- Robust AI
Robust AI, Inc.
6 patents
- Robert Bürkle ◀
Robert Bürkle GmbH
6 patents
What this shows Robert holds 6 patents at rank #42,693, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Robert
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,693 in granted patent volume.
- Risi Stone Inc. #42,689 · 6 patents
- Ritter GmbH #42,690 · 6 patents
- Robby Galletta Enterprises LLC #42,691 · 6 patents
- Robell Research, Inc. #42,692 · 6 patents
- Robert F. Nienhouse 1997 Declaration of Trust #42,694 · 6 patents
- Robo Industries, Inc. #42,695 · 6 patents
- Robson Forensic, Inc. #42,696 · 6 patents
- Robust AI, Inc. #42,697 · 6 patents
Leaders in B05B (Spraying Apparatus)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Robert's primary technology class.
Robert's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
50 Top 14% higher than 86% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 3 | 50.0% |
Which technologies does Robert Bürkle GmbH patent most?
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Robert Bürkle GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Robert Bürkle GmbH's lead technology class is B05B (Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B05B
- Ranked #42,703 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Robert Bürkle GmbH against Risi Stone Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 49.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.