Rhythm Watch Co., Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Rhythm ranks #23,297 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 0 technology areas.
- #23,297
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 1st percentile
- by Innovation Score (9.5/100)
- 1.0
- avg claims per patent
- -80%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R23297 · Foreign Corporation #23,297 · 12 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
- MID-PACK #23,297/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Response
- CPC-UNK CPC blank
- INNOV-LOW 9.5/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -80% vel
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Response Technologies, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Rhythm’s 9.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Rhythm
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Rhythm Watch · this assignee 9
Rhythm Watch · this assignee
9 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Rhythm's Innovation Score is 9.5/100 (1st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Rhythm?
Each dot is one of Rhythm’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Rhythm’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 19.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Rhythm's grants concentrate
Rhythm Watch Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2018 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Rhythm sits between Response Technologies, LLC and Rodenhouse, Inc..
Who files at Rhythm's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Response
Response Technologies, LLC
12 patents
- Resverlogix
Resverlogix Corp.
12 patents
- Revvity Health Sc…
Revvity Health Sciences, Inc.
12 patents
- Rexnord Flattop E…
Rexnord FlatTop Europe S.R.L.
12 patents
- Riboscience
Riboscience LLC
12 patents
- Right90
Right90, Inc.
12 patents
- Risk Management S…
Risk Management Solutions, Inc.
12 patents
- Rodenhouse
Rodenhouse, Inc.
12 patents
- Rhythm Watch ◀
Rhythm Watch Co., Ltd.
12 patents
What this shows Rhythm holds 12 patents at rank #23,301, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Rhythm
By rank, the assignees closest to #23,301 in granted patent volume.
- Response Technologies, LLC #23,297 · 12 patents
- Resverlogix Corp. #23,298 · 12 patents
- Revvity Health Sciences, Inc. #23,299 · 12 patents
- Rexnord FlatTop Europe S.R.L. #23,300 · 12 patents
- Riboscience LLC #23,302 · 12 patents
- Right90, Inc. #23,303 · 12 patents
- Risk Management Solutions, Inc. #23,304 · 12 patents
- Rodenhouse, Inc. #23,305 · 12 patents
Rhythm's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
9 1st percentile higher than 1% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 25.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 4 | 33.3% |
| 2019 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 8.3% |
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Rhythm Watch Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ranked #23,297 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Rhythm Watch Co., Ltd. against Response Technologies, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 9.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.