Rhombus Energy Solutions, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02J (Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Rhombus ranks #37,246 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #37,246
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 24th percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.6/100)
- 19.6
- avg claims per patent
- -83%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R37246 · US Corporation #37,246 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #37,246/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH RF Group
- CPC-NARROW H02J · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -83% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: RF Group LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Rhombus’s 27.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Rhombus
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Rhombus Energy… · this assignee 28
Rhombus Energy… · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Rhombus's Innovation Score is 27.6/100 (24th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Rhombus?
Each dot is one of Rhombus’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Rhombus’s own 19.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Rhombus's grants concentrate
Rhombus Energy Solutions, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under H02J (Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Rhombus sits between RF Group LLC and Ripple Therapeutics Corporation.
Who files at Rhombus's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- RF Group
RF Group LLC
7 patents
- RFA Brands
RFA Brands, LLC
7 patents
- Rfcyber
RFCyber Corp.
7 patents
- RGB Spectrum
RGB Spectrum
7 patents
- Ridge
Ridge Corporation
7 patents
- Ridley USA
Ridley USA Inc.
7 patents
- Ripelocker
Ripelocker, LLC
7 patents
- Ripple Therapeuti…
Ripple Therapeutics Corporation
7 patents
- Rhombus Energy So… ◀
Rhombus Energy Solutions, Inc.
7 patents
What this shows Rhombus holds 7 patents at rank #37,174, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Rhombus
By rank, the assignees closest to #37,174 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in H02J (Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distribu…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Rhombus's primary technology class.
- Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha 904 in class
- Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. 657 in class
- Apple Inc. 608 in class
- General Electric Company 590 in class
- Robert Bosch GmbH 437 in class
- Honda Motor Co., Ltd. 404 in class
- Qualcomm Incorporated 393 in class
- Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 368 in class
Rhombus's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 24th percentile higher than 24% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2016 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2019 | 3 | 42.9% |
| 2020 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Rhombus Energy Solutions, Inc. patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Rhombus Energy Solutions, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Rhombus Energy Solutions, Inc.'s lead technology class is H02J (Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H02J
- Ranked #37,246 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Rhombus Energy Solutions, Inc. against RF Group LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.