USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Reverse Ionizer Systems, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Reverse ranks #29,937 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 3 technology areas.

#29,937
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
15th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.7/100)
17.8
avg claims per patent
-50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R29937 · US Corporation #29,937 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
  • MID-PACK #29,937/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Renovo Software
  • CPC-NARROW C02F · 3 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 24.7/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 17.8 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -50% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Renovo Software, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Reverse’s 24.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Reverse

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Reverse's Innovation Score is 24.7/100 (15th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Reverse?

Each dot is one of Reverse’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Reverse’s own 17.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Reverse vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 8.98.999.1 1015202530 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Renovo Software, Inc. - 9, 19.22Renovo SoftwareResearch Cancer Institute of America - 9, 13.44Research Cancer I…Retrace Labs - 9, 17.67Retrace LabsRetrocausal, Inc. - 9, 19RetrocausalRi.MED Foundation - 9, 16.22Ri MED FoundationRideFlux Inc. - 9, 11.11RidefluxRimports, LLC - 9, 11.22RimportsRio Grande Neurosciences, Inc. - 9, 25.89Rio Grande Neuros…Reverse Ionizer Systems, LLC - 9, 17.78Reverse Ionizer S…
Reverse vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Reverse's grants concentrate

Reverse Ionizer Systems, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Reverse sits between Renovo Software, Inc. and Rio Grande Neurosciences, Inc..

Who files at Reverse's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Reverse holds 9 patents at rank #29,930, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Reverse

By rank, the assignees closest to #29,930 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C02F (Treatment OF Water)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Reverse's primary technology class.

Reverse's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

25 15th percentile higher than 15% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 20162017201920202021 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Reverse Ionizer Systems, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 3 33.3%
2017 1 11.1%
2019 2 22.2%
2020 2 22.2%
2021 1 11.1%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Reverse Ionizer Systems, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Reverse Ionizer Systems, LLC's lead technology class is C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C02F
  • Ranked #29,937 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Reverse Ionizer Systems, LLC against Renovo Software, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 24.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.