Reverse Ionizer Systems, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Reverse ranks #29,937 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #29,937
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 15th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.7/100)
- 17.8
- avg claims per patent
- -50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R29937 · US Corporation #29,937 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #29,937/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Renovo Software
- CPC-NARROW C02F · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.7/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Renovo Software, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Reverse’s 24.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Reverse
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Reverse Ionizer… · this assignee 25
Reverse Ionizer… · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Reverse's Innovation Score is 24.7/100 (15th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Reverse?
Each dot is one of Reverse’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Reverse’s own 17.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Reverse's grants concentrate
Reverse Ionizer Systems, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Reverse sits between Renovo Software, Inc. and Rio Grande Neurosciences, Inc..
Who files at Reverse's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Renovo Software
Renovo Software, Inc.
9 patents
- Research Cancer I…
Research Cancer Institute of America
9 patents
- Retrace Labs
Retrace Labs
9 patents
- Retrocausal
Retrocausal, Inc.
9 patents
- Ri MED Foundation
Ri.MED Foundation
9 patents
- Rideflux
RideFlux Inc.
9 patents
- Rimports
Rimports, LLC
9 patents
- Rio Grande Neuros…
Rio Grande Neurosciences, Inc.
9 patents
- Reverse Ionizer S… ◀
Reverse Ionizer Systems, LLC
9 patents
What this shows Reverse holds 9 patents at rank #29,930, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Reverse
By rank, the assignees closest to #29,930 in granted patent volume.
- Renovo Software, Inc. #29,926 · 9 patents
- Research Cancer Institute of America #29,927 · 9 patents
- Retrace Labs #29,928 · 9 patents
- Retrocausal, Inc. #29,929 · 9 patents
- Ri.MED Foundation #29,931 · 9 patents
- RideFlux Inc. #29,932 · 9 patents
- Rimports, LLC #29,933 · 9 patents
- Rio Grande Neurosciences, Inc. #29,934 · 9 patents
Leaders in C02F (Treatment OF Water)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Reverse's primary technology class.
- Ecolab USA Inc. 243 in class
- King Fahd University OF Petroleum AND Minerals 188 in class
- Evoqua Water Technologies LLC 177 in class
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 147 in class
- Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies Support 82 in class
- Kurita Water Industries Ltd. 80 in class
- Nanjing University 75 in class
- Kemira OYJ 55 in class
Reverse's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 15th percentile higher than 15% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 2017 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2019 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2020 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2021 | 1 | 11.1% |
Which technologies does Reverse Ionizer Systems, LLC patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Reverse Ionizer Systems, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Reverse Ionizer Systems, LLC's lead technology class is C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C02F
- Ranked #29,937 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Reverse Ionizer Systems, LLC against Renovo Software, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.