Retro Brands, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A24F (Smokers' REQUISITES; Match BOXES; Simulated Smoking Devices).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Retro ranks #42,649 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #42,649
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 3rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (14.8/100)
- 3.2
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R42649 · US Corporation #42,649 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #42,649/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Reqbo APS
- CPC-NARROW A24F · 3 areas
- INNOV-LOW 14.8/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 3.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Reqbo APS (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Retro’s 14.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Retro
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Retro Brands · this assignee 15
Retro Brands · this assignee
15 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Retro's Innovation Score is 14.8/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Retro?
Each dot is one of Retro’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Retro’s own 3.2 claims/patent is at or below the 15.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Retro's grants concentrate
Retro Brands, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 16.7% of grants classified under A24F (Smokers' REQUISITES; Match BOXES; Simulated Smoking Devices). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Retro sits between Reqbo APS and Rezonent Corporation.
Who files at Retro's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Reqbo APS
Reqbo APS
6 patents
- RES Polyflow
RES Polyflow LLC
6 patents
- Research Institut…
Research Institute OF Nanjing Chemical Industry Group
6 patents
- Restful Pump
Restful Pump, Inc.
6 patents
- REV Ambulance Gro…
REV Ambulance Group Orlando, Inc.
6 patents
- Rextac
REXtac, LLC
6 patents
- Reydel Automotive…
Reydel Automotive B.V.
6 patents
- Rezonent
Rezonent Corporation
6 patents
- Retro Brands ◀
Retro Brands, LLC
6 patents
What this shows Retro holds 6 patents at rank #42,568, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Retro
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,568 in granted patent volume.
- Reqbo APS #42,564 · 6 patents
- RES Polyflow LLC #42,565 · 6 patents
- Research Institute OF Nanjing Chemical Industry Group #42,566 · 6 patents
- Restful Pump, Inc. #42,567 · 6 patents
- REV Ambulance Group Orlando, Inc. #42,569 · 6 patents
- REXtac, LLC #42,570 · 6 patents
- Reydel Automotive B.V. #42,571 · 6 patents
- Rezonent Corporation #42,572 · 6 patents
Leaders in A24F (Smokers' Requisites)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Retro's primary technology class.
- Altria Client Services LLC 839 in class
- Philip Morris Products S.A. 686 in class
- RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. 430 in class
- Nicoventures Trading Limited 335 in class
- KT&G Corporation 273 in class
- Japan Tobacco Inc. 250 in class
- Huizhou Kimree Technology Co., Ltd. Shenzhen Branch 198 in class
- JT International SA 163 in class
Retro's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
15 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 5 | 83.3% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Retro Brands, LLC patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Retro Brands, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Retro Brands, LLC's lead technology class is A24F (Smokers' REQUISITES; Match BOXES; Simulated Smoking Devices), 16.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A24F
- Ranked #42,649 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Retro Brands, LLC against Reqbo APS, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 14.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.