Where does Regency Seating, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Regency Seating, Inc. ranks #29,913 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Regency Seating, Inc. hold?

Regency Seating, Inc. holds 9 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2023, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is Regency Seating, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Regency Seating, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 23.2 out of 100 (12th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Regency Seating, Inc. focus on?

Regency Seating, Inc.'s top technology area is A47B (TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture) with 5 patents, ranking #180 of 990 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is Regency Seating, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Regency Seating, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +250% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Regency Seating, Inc.'s patents?

Regency Seating, Inc.'s patents average 9.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Regency Seating, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Regency Seating, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47B (TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Regency ranks #29,913 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 5 technology areas.

#29,913
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 12th percentile
by Innovation Score (23.2/100): 9.1
avg claims per patent: +250%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R29913 · US Corporation #29,913 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
MID-PACK #29,913/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH RealVNC
CPC-NARROW A47B · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 23.2/100
CLAIMS-PAR 9.1 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +250% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: RealVNC Ltd (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Regency’s 23.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.0 pts (34%) Velocity 1.9 pts (8%) Breadth 7.9 pts (34%) Claim depth 5.5 pts (24%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Regency Seating · this assignee

23
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Regency's Innovation Score is 23.2/100 (12th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Regency?

Each dot is one of Regency’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Regency’s own 9.1 claims/patent is at or below the 13.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Regency vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Regency's grants concentrate

Regency Seating, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 55.6% of grants classified under A47B (TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Regency sits between ReaMetrix Inc. and Rembe GmbH Safety + Control.

Regency's three-year grant acceleration

Regency Seating, Inc. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 7 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Reametrix

9
Realvnc

9
Rechar

9
Reell Precision M…

9
Regenesis Biomedi…

9
Regenexx

9
Relyon Plasma

9
Rembe Safety + Co…

9
Regency Seating ◀

9

What this shows Regency holds 9 patents at rank #29,915, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Regency

By rank, the assignees closest to #29,915 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A47B (Tables)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Regency's primary technology class.

Regency's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

23 12th percentile higher than 12% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Regency Seating, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	2	22.2%
2020	3	33.3%
2021	2	22.2%
2022	1	11.1%
2023	1	11.1%

Which technologies does Regency Seating, Inc. patent most?

A47B - TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture 5

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 3

F16B - Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing 2

B65D - Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR Fittings THEREFOR; Packaging ELEMENTS; Packages 2

A47C - CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Regency Seating, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Regency Seating, Inc.'s lead technology class is A47B (TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture), 55.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47B
Ranked #29,913 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Regency Seating, Inc. against ReaMetrix Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 23.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.