USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Red Viking Group, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2023–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Red ranks #21,672 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 0 technology areas.

#21,672
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
32nd percentile
by Innovation Score (29.7/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R21672 · US Corporation #21,672 · 13 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
  • MID-PACK #21,672/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Ravensburger
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-THIN 29.7/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • SPAN-YRS 2023–2025 · 3y
  • BOOK-RICH 8/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Ravensburger AG (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Red’s 29.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Red

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Red's Innovation Score is 29.7/100 (32nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Red?

Each dot is one of Red’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Red’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 18.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Red vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 12.912.91313.1 010203040 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Ravensburger AG - 13, 1RavensburgerReactiveCore LLC - 13, 19.23ReactivecoreReal Action Paintball, Inc (RAP4) - 13, 17Real Action Paint…Real Imaging Technology Co., Ltd - 13, 9.77Real Imaging Tech…RedShift BioAnalytics Inc. - 13, 22.62Redshift Bioanaly…Redwood Robotics Inc. - 13, 18.15Redwood RoboticsRefratechnik Holding GmbH - 13, 33.31Refratechnik Hold…RegenLab USA LLC - 13, 21.38Regenlab USARed Viking Group, Inc. - 13, 1Red Viking Group
Red vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Red's grants concentrate

Red Viking Group, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2024 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, Red sits between Ravensburger AG and RegenLab USA LLC.

Red's three-year grant acceleration

Red Viking Group, Inc. shows 8 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Red's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Red holds 13 patents at rank #21,688, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Red

By rank, the assignees closest to #21,688 in granted patent volume.

Red's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 32nd percentile higher than 32% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 202320242025 5
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2023–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Red Viking Group, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2023 1 7.7%
2024 7 53.8%
2025partial year 5 38.5%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Red Viking Group, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #21,672 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Red Viking Group, Inc. against Ravensburger AG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 29.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.