Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61Q (Specific USE OF Cosmetics OR Similar Toiletry Preparations).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Reckitt ranks #33,020 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 10 technology areas.
- #33,020
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 34th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.4/100)
- 19.4
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R33020 · Foreign Corporation #33,020 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #33,020/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Raute Oyj
- CPC-FOCUS A61Q · 10 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.4/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Raute Oyj (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Reckitt’s 30.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Reckitt
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Reckitt Benckiser (UK) · this assignee 30
Reckitt Benckiser (UK) · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Reckitt's Innovation Score is 30.4/100 (34th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Reckitt?
Each dot is one of Reckitt’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Reckitt’s own 19.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Reckitt's grants concentrate
Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 37.5% of grants classified under A61Q (Specific USE OF Cosmetics OR Similar Toiletry Preparations). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Reckitt sits between Raute Oyj and Red Leader Technologies, Inc..
Who files at Reckitt's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Raute Oyj
Raute Oyj
8 patents
- Raycast Systems
Raycast Systems, Inc.
8 patents
- Raze Therapeutics
Raze Therapeutics, Inc.
8 patents
- Revision Optics
ReVision Optics, Inc.
8 patents
- Recommind
Recommind, Inc.
8 patents
- Recorded Future
Recorded Future, Inc.
8 patents
- Red Creamery
Red Creamery LLC
8 patents
- Red Leader
Red Leader Technologies, Inc.
8 patents
- Reckitt Benckiser… ◀
Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Limited
8 patents
What this shows Reckitt holds 8 patents at rank #33,054, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Reckitt
By rank, the assignees closest to #33,054 in granted patent volume.
- Raute Oyj #33,050 · 8 patents
- Raycast Systems, Inc. #33,051 · 8 patents
- Raze Therapeutics, Inc. #33,052 · 8 patents
- ReVision Optics, Inc. #33,053 · 8 patents
- Recommind, Inc. #33,055 · 8 patents
- Recorded Future, Inc. #33,056 · 8 patents
- Red Creamery LLC #33,057 · 8 patents
- Red Leader Technologies, Inc. #33,058 · 8 patents
Leaders in A61Q (Specific USE OF Cosmetics OR Similar Toiletry Preparations)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Reckitt's primary technology class.
Reckitt's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 34th percentile higher than 34% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2016 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Limited patent most?
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Limited's lead technology class is A61Q (Specific USE OF Cosmetics OR Similar Toiletry Preparations), 37.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61Q
- Ranked #33,020 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Limited against Raute Oyj, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.