Where does Reality Analytics, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Reality Analytics, Inc. ranks #27,244 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Reality Analytics, Inc. hold?

Reality Analytics, Inc. holds 10 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2022, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Reality Analytics, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Reality Analytics, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 32.7 out of 100 (42nd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Reality Analytics, Inc. focus on?

Reality Analytics, Inc.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 7 patents, ranking #4,773 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is Reality Analytics, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Reality Analytics, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -57% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Reality Analytics, Inc.'s patents?

Reality Analytics, Inc.'s patents average 22.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Reality Analytics, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Reality Analytics, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Reality ranks #27,244 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 7 technology areas.

#27,244
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 42nd percentile
by Innovation Score (32.7/100): 22.4
avg claims per patent: -57%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R27244 · US Corporation #27,244 · 10 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
MID-PACK #27,244/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Rayprus Technology…
CPC-NARROW G06F · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 32.7/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 22.4 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -57% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Rayprus Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Reality’s 32.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.3 pts (25%) Velocity 1.7 pts (5%) Breadth 9.4 pts (29%) Claim depth 13.4 pts (41%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Reality Analytics · this assignee

33
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Reality's Innovation Score is 32.7/100 (42nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Reality?

Each dot is one of Reality’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Reality’s own 22.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Reality vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Reality's grants concentrate

Reality Analytics, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 70% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Reality sits between Rayprus Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd. and Renon Power Technology Inc..

Reality's three-year grant acceleration

Reality Analytics, Inc. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Rayprus Technolog…

10
Raytheon Cyber Pr…

10
Reaction Engines

10
Real-time Innovat…

10
Recognition Robot…

10
Recruit

10
Redox

10
Renon Power Techn…

10
Reality Analytics ◀

10

What this shows Reality holds 10 patents at rank #27,258, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Reality

By rank, the assignees closest to #27,258 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Reality's primary technology class.

Reality's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 42nd percentile higher than 42% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Reality Analytics, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	3	30.0%
2018	2	20.0%
2019	2	20.0%
2020	1	10.0%
2021	1	10.0%
2022	1	10.0%

Which technologies does Reality Analytics, Inc. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 7

G10L - Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding 6

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 5

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 2

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 1

G01B - Measuring Length, Thickness OR Similar Linear DIMENSIONS; Measuring ANGLES; Measuring AREAS; Measuring Irregularities OF Surfaces OR Contours 1

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Reality Analytics, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Reality Analytics, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 70% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #27,244 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Reality Analytics, Inc. against Rayprus Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 32.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.