RDS
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2021–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, RDS ranks #29,906 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #29,906
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 10th percentile
- by Innovation Score (22.5/100)
- 10.3
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R29906 · Foreign Corporation #29,906 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #29,906/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Radcom
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 22.5/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 10.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- SPAN-YRS 2021–2024 · 4y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Radcom Ltd (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How RDS’s 22.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around RDS
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- RDS · this assignee 22
RDS · this assignee
22 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows RDS's Innovation Score is 22.5/100 (10th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for RDS?
Each dot is one of RDS’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). RDS’s own 10.3 claims/patent is at or below the 11.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where RDS's grants concentrate
RDS is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 77.8% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (6 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2024. By volume, RDS sits between R.S.M. Electron Power, Inc. and Reigstad & Associates, Inc..
RDS's three-year grant acceleration
RDS shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at RDS's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- R S M Electron Po…
R.S.M. Electron Power, Inc.
9 patents
- Radcom
Radcom Ltd
9 patents
- Raritan Americas
Raritan Americas, Inc.
9 patents
- Rational Intellec…
Rational Intellectual Holdings Limited
9 patents
- Redbarn PET Produ…
Redbarn PET Products, LLC.
9 patents
- Redwire Space
Redwire Space, Inc.
9 patents
- Region Midtjylland
Region Midtjylland
9 patents
- Reigstad & Associ…
Reigstad & Associates, Inc.
9 patents
- RDS ◀
RDS
9 patents
What this shows RDS holds 9 patents at rank #29,871, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near RDS
By rank, the assignees closest to #29,871 in granted patent volume.
- R.S.M. Electron Power, Inc. #29,867 · 9 patents
- Radcom Ltd #29,868 · 9 patents
- Raritan Americas, Inc. #29,869 · 9 patents
- Rational Intellectual Holdings Limited #29,870 · 9 patents
- Redbarn PET Products, LLC. #29,872 · 9 patents
- Redwire Space, Inc. #29,873 · 9 patents
- Region Midtjylland #29,874 · 9 patents
- Reigstad & Associates, Inc. #29,875 · 9 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in RDS's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
RDS's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
22 10th percentile higher than 10% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 2024 | 3 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does RDS patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
RDS's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- RDS's lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 77.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #29,906 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare RDS against R.S.M. Electron Power, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 22.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.