Where does Ragner Technology Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Ragner Technology Corporation ranks #23,263 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Ragner Technology Corporation hold?

Ragner Technology Corporation holds 12 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2020, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is Ragner Technology Corporation's Innovation Score?

Ragner Technology Corporation has an Innovation Score of 30.2 out of 100 (33rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Ragner Technology Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Ragner Technology Corporation's recent grant velocity is -80% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Ragner Technology Corporation's patents?

Ragner Technology Corporation's patents average 22.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Ragner Technology Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Ragner Technology Corporation

Q: What technology areas does Ragner Technology Corporation focus on?

Ragner Technology Corporation's top technology area is F16L (PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General) with 9 patents, ranking #214 of 1,907 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16L (PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Ragner ranks #23,263 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 5 technology areas.

#23,263
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 33rd percentile
by Innovation Score (30.2/100): 22.3
avg claims per patent: -80%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R23263 · US Corporation #23,263 · 12 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
MID-PACK #23,263/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Radians
CPC-NARROW F16L · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 30.2/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 22.3 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -80% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Radians, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Ragner’s 30.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.9 pts (29%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 7.9 pts (26%) Claim depth 13.4 pts (44%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Ragner Technology · this assignee

30
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Ragner's Innovation Score is 30.2/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Ragner?

Each dot is one of Ragner’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Ragner’s own 22.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Ragner vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Ragner's grants concentrate

Ragner Technology Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 75% of grants classified under F16L (PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Ragner sits between Romax Technology Limited and ReMYND N.V..

Romax Technology

12
Rotarex

12
Rsem Partnership

12
Radians

12
Ransburg Industri…

12
Ravenwhite Securi…

12
Reflow Medical

12
Remynd

12
Ragner Technology ◀

12

What this shows Ragner holds 12 patents at rank #23,286, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Ragner

By rank, the assignees closest to #23,286 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16L (Pipes)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Ragner's primary technology class.

Ragner's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Ragner Technology Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	4	33.3%
2016	3	25.0%
2017	1	8.3%
2019	2	16.7%
2020	2	16.7%

Which technologies does Ragner Technology Corporation patent most?

F16L - PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General 9

D03D - Woven FABRICS; Methods OF WEAVING; Looms 2

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 2

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 2

B65H - Handling Thin OR Filamentary Material, e.g. Sheets, Webs, Cables 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Ragner Technology Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Ragner Technology Corporation's lead technology class is F16L (PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General), 75% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16L
Ranked #23,263 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Ragner Technology Corporation against Romax Technology Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.