Quality Edge, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 19 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E04D (Roof COVERINGS; SKY-LIGHTS; GUTTERS; Roof-working Tools).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Quality ranks #15,562 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 19 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #15,562
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 32%
- by Innovation Score (41.9/100)
- 15.8
- avg claims per patent
- -64%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R15562 · US Corporation #15,562 · 19 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 19 grants
- MID-PACK #15,562/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Prometheus Applied
- CPC-NARROW E04D · 6 areas
- INNOV-PAR 41.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -64% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Prometheus Applied Technologies LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Quality’s 41.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Quality
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Quality Edge · this assignee
Quality Edge · this assignee
42 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Quality's Innovation Score is 41.9/100 (top 32% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Quality?
Each dot is one of Quality’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Quality’s own 15.8 claims/patent is at or below the 18.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Quality's grants concentrate
Quality Edge, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 57.9% of grants classified under E04D (Roof COVERINGS; SKY-LIGHTS; GUTTERS; Roof-working Tools). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Quality sits between Prometheus Applied Technologies LLC and Quirklogic, Inc..
Quality's three-year grant acceleration
Quality Edge, Inc. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Quality's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Prometheus Applied
Prometheus Applied Technologies LLC
19 patents
- Proprietary
Proprietary Technologies, Inc.
19 patents
- Q (Cue)
Q (Cue) Ltd.
19 patents
- QC Ware
QC Ware Corp.
19 patents
- Quality MAT
Quality MAT Company
19 patents
- Questek Innovatio…
Questek Innovations LLC
19 patents
- Qioptiq
Qioptiq Limited
19 patents
- Quirklogic
Quirklogic, Inc.
19 patents
- Quality Edge ◀
Quality Edge, Inc.
19 patents
What this shows Quality holds 19 patents at rank #15,557, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Quality
By rank, the assignees closest to #15,557 in granted patent volume.
- Prometheus Applied Technologies LLC #15,553 · 19 patents
- Proprietary Technologies, Inc. #15,554 · 19 patents
- Q (Cue) Ltd. #15,555 · 19 patents
- QC Ware Corp. #15,556 · 19 patents
- Quality MAT Company #15,558 · 19 patents
- Questek Innovations LLC #15,559 · 19 patents
- Qioptiq Limited #15,560 · 19 patents
- Quirklogic, Inc. #15,561 · 19 patents
Leaders in E04D (Roof Coverings)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Quality's primary technology class.
Quality's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
42 Top 32% higher than 68% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 | 26.3% |
| 2016 | 4 | 21.1% |
| 2017 | 3 | 15.8% |
| 2018 | 1 | 5.3% |
| 2019 | 1 | 5.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 5.3% |
| 2022 | 2 | 10.5% |
| 2023 | 2 | 10.5% |
Which technologies does Quality Edge, Inc. patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Quality Edge, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Quality Edge, Inc.'s lead technology class is E04D (Roof COVERINGS; SKY-LIGHTS; GUTTERS; Roof-working Tools), 57.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E04D
- Ranked #15,562 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Quality Edge, Inc. against Prometheus Applied Technologies LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 41.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.