Where does Qcify, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Qcify, Inc. ranks #18,025 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Qcify, Inc. hold?

Qcify, Inc. holds 16 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2025, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is Qcify, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Qcify, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 34.5 out of 100 (48th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Qcify, Inc. focus on?

Qcify, Inc.'s top technology area is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television) with 16 patents, ranking #911 of 5,951 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is Qcify, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Qcify, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -17% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Qcify, Inc.'s patents?

Qcify, Inc.'s patents average 19.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Qcify, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Qcify, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 16 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Qcify ranks #18,025 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 16 patents across 5 technology areas.

#18,025
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 48th percentile
by Innovation Score (34.5/100): 19.1
avg claims per patent: -17%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R18025 · US Corporation #18,025 · 16 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 16 grants
MID-PACK #18,025/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Pro Mart Industries
CPC-NARROW H04N · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 34.5/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.1 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -17% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Pro Mart Industries (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Qcify’s 34.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.8 pts (28%) Velocity 5.3 pts (15%) Breadth 7.9 pts (23%) Claim depth 11.4 pts (33%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Contentguard Holdings · near

34
Latchways · near

34
Qcify · this assignee

34
Cambridge Sound… · near

34
Onyx Therapeutics · near

34
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Qcify's Innovation Score is 34.5/100 (48th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Qcify?

Each dot is one of Qcify’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Qcify’s own 19.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Qcify vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Qcify's grants concentrate

Qcify, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Qcify sits between Pro Mart Industries and Quest Engines, LLC.

Qcify's three-year grant acceleration

Qcify, Inc. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Pro Mart Industri…

16
Professional Disp…

16
Proton Power

16
Pura Scents

16
Qiaokang Biotech…

16
Qingdao Hisense H…

16
Qualicaps

16
Quest Engines

16
Qcify ◀

16

What this shows Qcify holds 16 patents at rank #18,021, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Qcify

By rank, the assignees closest to #18,021 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04N (Pictorial Communication)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Qcify's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Qcify, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H04N (Pictorial Communication), Qcify ranks #911 of 5,951 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (34 here).

Latchways plc 34 Contentguard Holdings, Inc. 34 Onyx Therapeutics, Inc. 34 Cambridge Sound Management, Inc. 34

Qcify's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 48th percentile higher than 48% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Qcify, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	2	12.5%
2019	4	25.0%
2021	1	6.3%
2022	1	6.3%
2023	2	12.5%
2024	1	6.3%
2025partial year	5	31.3%

Which technologies does Qcify, Inc. patent most?

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 16

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 16

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 5

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 1

B07C - Postal SORTING; Sorting Individual Articles, OR Bulk Material FIT TO BE Sorted Piece-meal, e.g. BY Picking 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Qcify, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Qcify, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04N
Ranked #18,025 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Qcify, Inc. against Pro Mart Industries, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 34.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.