Project Soak, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2025–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Project ranks #27,184 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 0 technology areas.
- #27,184
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 1st percentile
- by Innovation Score (8.9/100)
- 1.0
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R27184 · US Corporation #27,184 · 10 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
- MID-PACK #27,184/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Processing Internati…
- CPC-UNK CPC blank
- INNOV-LOW 8.9/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2025–2025 · 1y
- BOOK-RICH 8/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Processing Technologies International, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Project’s 8.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Project
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Project Soak · this assignee 9
Project Soak · this assignee
9 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Project's Innovation Score is 8.9/100 (1st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Project?
Each dot is one of Project’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Project’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 16.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Project's grants concentrate
Project Soak, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . By volume, Project sits between ProMab Biotechnologies, Inc. and PubNub, Inc..
Who files at Project's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Promab Biotechnol…
ProMab Biotechnologies, Inc.
10 patents
- Pronova Solutions
ProNova Solutions, LLC
10 patents
- Processing Intern…
Processing Technologies International, LLC
10 patents
- Profoto Aktiebolag
Profoto Aktiebolag
10 patents
- Prostar Energy (U…
Prostar Energy Technologies (USA) LLC
10 patents
- Proventia Oy
Proventia Oy
10 patents
- Pryon Incorporated
Pryon Incorporated
10 patents
- Pubnub
PubNub, Inc.
10 patents
- Project Soak ◀
Project Soak, LLC
10 patents
What this shows Project holds 10 patents at rank #27,184, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Project
By rank, the assignees closest to #27,184 in granted patent volume.
- ProMab Biotechnologies, Inc. #27,180 · 10 patents
- ProNova Solutions, LLC #27,181 · 10 patents
- Processing Technologies International, LLC #27,182 · 10 patents
- Profoto Aktiebolag #27,183 · 10 patents
- Prostar Energy Technologies (USA) LLC #27,185 · 10 patents
- Proventia Oy #27,186 · 10 patents
- Pryon Incorporated #27,187 · 10 patents
- PubNub, Inc. #27,188 · 10 patents
Project's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
9 1st percentile higher than 1% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2025–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2025partial year | 10 | 100.0% |
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Project Soak, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ranked #27,184 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Project Soak, LLC against ProMab Biotechnologies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 8.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.