Project Giants, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Project ranks #42,462 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #42,462
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 48%
- by Innovation Score (35.9/100)
- 17.5
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R42462 · US Corporation #42,462 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #42,462/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Profeat Biotechnology
- CPC-NARROW H04N · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 35.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Profeat Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Project’s 35.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Project
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Project Giants · this assignee
Project Giants · this assignee
36 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Project's Innovation Score is 35.9/100 (top 48% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Project?
Each dot is one of Project’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Project’s own 17.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Project's grants concentrate
Project Giants, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Project sits between Profeat Biotechnology Co., Ltd. and Proshale LLC.
Project's three-year grant acceleration
Project Giants, LLC shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Project's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Profeat Biotechno…
Profeat Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Progress-werk Obe…
Progress-werk Oberkirch AG
6 patents
- Progressive Compo…
Progressive Components International Corporation
6 patents
- Proionic
Proionic GMBH
6 patents
- Prokidney
Prokidney
6 patents
- Promedior
Promedior, Inc.
6 patents
- Prometic Bioscien…
Prometic Biosciences Inc.
6 patents
- Proshale
Proshale LLC
6 patents
- Project Giants ◀
Project Giants, LLC
6 patents
What this shows Project holds 6 patents at rank #42,298, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Project
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,298 in granted patent volume.
- Profeat Biotechnology Co., Ltd. #42,294 · 6 patents
- Progress-werk Oberkirch AG #42,295 · 6 patents
- Progressive Components International Corporation #42,296 · 6 patents
- Proionic GMBH #42,297 · 6 patents
- Prokidney #42,299 · 6 patents
- Promedior, Inc. #42,300 · 6 patents
- Prometic Biosciences Inc. #42,301 · 6 patents
- Proshale LLC #42,302 · 6 patents
Leaders in H04N (Pictorial Communication)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Project's primary technology class.
Project's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
36 Top 48% higher than 52% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Project Giants, LLC patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Project Giants, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Project Giants, LLC's lead technology class is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04N
- Ranked #42,462 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Project Giants, LLC against Profeat Biotechnology Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 35.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.