Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 37 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative,).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Progressive ranks #8,664 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 37 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #8,664
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 31%
- by Innovation Score (42.5/100)
- 24.4
- avg claims per patent
- +40%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R8664 · US Corporation #8,664 · 37 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 37 grants
- UPPER-Q #8,664/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Once Innovations
- CPC-NARROW G06Q · 8 areas
- INNOV-PAR 42.5/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 24.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-UP +40% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Once Innovations, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Progressive’s 42.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Progressive
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- DHK Storage · near
DHK Storage · near
42 score
- Diehl Metering · near
Diehl Metering · near
42 score
- Horton · near
Horton · near
42 score
- Progressive… · this assignee
Progressive… · this assignee
42 score
- Urgo Recherche… · near
Urgo Recherche… · near
42 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Progressive's Innovation Score is 42.5/100 (top 31% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Progressive?
Each dot is one of Progressive’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Progressive’s own 24.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Progressive's grants concentrate
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 78.4% of grants classified under G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative,). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (6 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Progressive sits between Orthohelix Surgical Designs, Inc. and Pieris Pharmaceuticals GmbH.
Progressive's three-year grant acceleration
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company shows 11 grants in 2022–2024 against only 14 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Progressive's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Orthohelix Surgic…
Orthohelix Surgical Designs, Inc.
37 patents
- Once Innovations
Once Innovations, Inc.
37 patents
- Oxylabs UAB
Oxylabs, UAB
37 patents
- Pacific Engineeri…
Pacific Engineering Corporation
37 patents
- Prologium Technol…
Prologium Technology Co., Ltd.
37 patents
- Protec
Protec Co., Ltd.
37 patents
- Pandora Media
Pandora Media, Inc.
37 patents
- Pieris Pharmaceut…
Pieris Pharmaceuticals GmbH
37 patents
- Progressive Casua… ◀
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
37 patents
What this shows Progressive holds 37 patents at rank #8,660, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Progressive
By rank, the assignees closest to #8,660 in granted patent volume.
- Orthohelix Surgical Designs, Inc. #8,656 · 37 patents
- Once Innovations, Inc. #8,657 · 37 patents
- Oxylabs, UAB #8,658 · 37 patents
- Pacific Engineering Corporation #8,659 · 37 patents
- Prologium Technology Co., Ltd. #8,661 · 37 patents
- Protec Co., Ltd. #8,662 · 37 patents
- Pandora Media, Inc. #8,663 · 37 patents
- Pieris Pharmaceuticals GmbH #8,664 · 37 patents
Leaders in G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Progressive's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 6,621 in class
- Google LLC 3,295 in class
- Capital ONE Services, LLC 3,005 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 2,993 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 2,990 in class
- Facebook, Inc. 1,919 in class
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 1,697 in class
- Mastercard International Incorporated 1,644 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Progressive, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially…), Progressive ranks #468 of 6,520 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (42 here).
Progressive's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
42 Top 31% higher than 69% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 8.1% |
| 2016 | 2 | 5.4% |
| 2017 | 2 | 5.4% |
| 2018 | 4 | 10.8% |
| 2019 | 4 | 10.8% |
| 2020 | 6 | 16.2% |
| 2021 | 4 | 10.8% |
| 2022 | 5 | 13.5% |
| 2023 | 4 | 10.8% |
| 2024 | 2 | 5.4% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 2.7% |
Which technologies does Progressive Casualty Insurance Company patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Progressive Casualty Insurance Company's lead technology class is G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative,), 78.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06Q
- Ranked #8,664 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Progressive Casualty Insurance Company against Orthohelix Surgical Designs, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 42.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.