USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Pretty Star Store LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 46 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Pretty ranks #7,180 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 46 patents across 0 technology areas.

#7,180
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
2nd percentile
by Innovation Score (13.9/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R7180 · US Corporation #7,180 · 46 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-SMALL 46 grants
  • UPPER-Q #7,180/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Phoenix Contact…
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-LOW 13.9/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Phoenix Contact Development and Manufacturing, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Pretty’s 13.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Pretty

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Pretty's Innovation Score is 13.9/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Pretty?

Each dot is one of Pretty’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Pretty’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 12.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Pretty vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 45.946.046.04646.046.046.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Phoenix Contact Development and Manufacturing, Inc. - 46, 14.85Phoenix Contact D…Ping Identity Corporation - 46, 19.65Ping IdentityPitney Bowes Inc. - 46, 12.3Pitney BowesPrecitec GmbH & Co. KG - 46, 12.24Precitec & KGPublic University Corporation Yokohama City University - 46, 10.52Public University…Pulse Secure, LLC - 46, 21.35Pulse SecurePyeong Hwa Automotive Co., Ltd. - 46, 13.59Pyeong Hwa Automo…Reynolds Presto Products Inc. - 46, 12.28Reynolds Presto P…Pretty Star Store LLC - 46, 1Pretty Star Store
Pretty vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Pretty's grants concentrate

Pretty Star Store LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2016 (26 grants) versus a trough of 9 in 2017. By volume, Pretty sits between Phoenix Contact Development and Manufacturing, Inc. and Reynolds Presto Products Inc..

Who files at Pretty's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Pretty holds 46 patents at rank #7,179, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Pretty

By rank, the assignees closest to #7,179 in granted patent volume.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Pretty, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Pretty's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

14 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

51015202530 201520162017 9
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2017

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Pretty Star Store LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 11 23.9%
2016 26 56.5%
2017 9 19.6%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Pretty Star Store LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #7,180 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Pretty Star Store LLC against Phoenix Contact Development and Manufacturing, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 13.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.