Where does Practice Fusion, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Practice Fusion, Inc. ranks #49,713 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Practice Fusion, Inc. hold?

Practice Fusion, Inc. holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2017, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is Practice Fusion, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Practice Fusion, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 21.3 out of 100 (8th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Practice Fusion, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Practice Fusion, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Practice Fusion, Inc.'s patents?

Practice Fusion, Inc.'s patents average 12.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Practice Fusion, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Practice Fusion, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does Practice Fusion, Inc. focus on?

Practice Fusion, Inc.'s top technology area is G16Z (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Specific Application Fields, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 3 patents, ranking #142 of 425 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G16Z (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Specific Application Fields, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Practice ranks #49,713 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 5 technology areas.

#49,713
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 8th percentile
by Innovation Score (21.3/100): 12.0
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R49713 · US Corporation #49,713 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #49,713/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Powercube Semi
CPC-NARROW G16Z · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 21.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Powercube Semi Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Practice’s 21.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (29%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 7.9 pts (37%) Claim depth 7.2 pts (34%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Practice Fusion · this assignee

21
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Practice's Innovation Score is 21.3/100 (8th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Practice?

Each dot is one of Practice’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Practice’s own 12.0 claims/patent is at or below the 13.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Practice vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Practice's grants concentrate

Practice Fusion, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under G16Z (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Specific Application Fields, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Practice sits between PowerSphyr Inc. and Pre-Chasm Research Limited.

Powersphyr

5
Powercube Semi

5
Powrtran

5
Practical Design…

5
Prasidiux

5
Pratt & Whitney S…

5
Prayon

5
Pre-chasm Research

5
Practice Fusion ◀

5

What this shows Practice holds 5 patents at rank #49,786, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Practice

By rank, the assignees closest to #49,786 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G16Z (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Practice's primary technology class.

Practice's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

21 8th percentile higher than 8% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2017

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Practice Fusion, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	20.0%
2016	1	20.0%
2017	3	60.0%

Which technologies does Practice Fusion, Inc. patent most?

G16Z - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Specific Application Fields, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 3

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 2

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 2

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Practice Fusion, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Practice Fusion, Inc.'s lead technology class is G16Z (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Specific Application Fields, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G16Z
Ranked #49,713 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Practice Fusion, Inc. against PowerSphyr Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 21.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.