USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Plantas de Navarra S.A.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Plantas ranks #29,789 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 0 technology areas.

#29,789
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
28th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.6/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
-40%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R29789 · Foreign Corporation #29,789 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
  • MID-PACK #29,789/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Pika Energy
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-THIN 28.6/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DOWN -40% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Pika Energy, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Plantas’s 28.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Plantas

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Plantas's Innovation Score is 28.6/100 (28th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Plantas?

Each dot is one of Plantas’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Plantas’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 17.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Plantas vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 8.98.999.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Pika Energy, Inc. - 9, 17.22Pika EnergyPinn, Inc. - 9, 25.89PinnPistonPower ApS - 9, 18.44Pistonpower ApsPlanar Semiconductor, Inc. - 9, 21.44Planar Semiconduc…Plasma Tech Holdings, LLC - 9, 23.67Plasma Tech Holdi…Plasticolor Molded Products Inc. - 9, 2.44Plasticolor Molde…Plastipak Bawt, S.à.r.l. - 9, 13.78Plastipak Bawt S…Playworld Systems, Inc. - 9, 3.33Playworld SystemsPlantas de Navarra S.A. - 9, 1Plantas de Navarra
Plantas vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Plantas's grants concentrate

Plantas de Navarra S.A. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2024 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Plantas sits between Pika Energy, Inc. and Playworld Systems, Inc..

Plantas's three-year grant acceleration

Plantas de Navarra S.A. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Plantas's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Plantas holds 9 patents at rank #29,800, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Plantas

By rank, the assignees closest to #29,800 in granted patent volume.

Plantas's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 28th percentile higher than 28% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 201520162018201920242025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Plantas de Navarra S.A. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 11.1%
2016 2 22.2%
2018 1 11.1%
2019 1 11.1%
2024 3 33.3%
2025partial year 1 11.1%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Plantas de Navarra S.A.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #29,789 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Plantas de Navarra S.A. against Pika Energy, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 28.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.