Where does Pixia Corp. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Pixia Corp. ranks #7,458 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Pixia Corp. hold?

Pixia Corp. holds 44 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2023, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is Pixia Corp.'s Innovation Score?

Pixia Corp. has an Innovation Score of 38.2 out of 100 (top 41% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Pixia Corp. focus on?

Pixia Corp.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 39 patents, ranking #1,196 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

Is Pixia Corp.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Pixia Corp.'s recent grant velocity is -48% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Pixia Corp.'s patents?

Pixia Corp.'s patents average 23.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Pixia Corp. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Pixia Corp.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 44 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Pixia ranks #7,458 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 44 patents across 6 technology areas.

#7,458
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 41%
by Innovation Score (38.2/100): 23.3
avg claims per patent: -48%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R7458 · US Corporation #7,458 · 44 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 44 grants
UPPER-Q #7,458/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Omni United (S) PTE
CPC-NARROW G06F · 6 areas
INNOV-THIN 38.2/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 23.3 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -48% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Omni United (S) PTE Ltd (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Pixia’s 38.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 13.1 pts (34%) Velocity 2.4 pts (6%) Breadth 8.7 pts (23%) Claim depth 14.0 pts (37%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Altergon · near

38
Institut DE… · near

38
Iontra · near

38
Pixia · this assignee

38
Start Project · near

38
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Pixia's Innovation Score is 38.2/100 (top 41% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Pixia?

Each dot is one of Pixia’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Pixia’s own 23.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Pixia vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Pixia's grants concentrate

Pixia Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 88.6% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (9 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2022. By volume, Pixia sits between Omni United (S) PTE Ltd and Pierce Biotechnology, Inc..

Pixia's three-year grant acceleration

Pixia Corp. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 14 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Omni United (S) P…

44
OTI Lumionics

44
Omniscient Neurot…

44
PFM Medical

44
Prologium Holding

44
Protean Electric

44
People

44
Pierce Biotechnol…

44
Pixia ◀

44

What this shows Pixia holds 44 patents at rank #7,455, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Pixia

By rank, the assignees closest to #7,455 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Pixia's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Pixia, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), Pixia ranks #1,196 of 13,878 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (38 here).

Altergon SA 38 Institut DE Recherche Pour LE Developpement 38 Iontra Inc 38 Start Project, LLC 38

Pixia's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

38 Top 41% higher than 59% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Pixia Corp. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	9	20.5%
2016	7	15.9%
2017	5	11.4%
2018	4	9.1%
2019	4	9.1%
2020	6	13.6%
2021	4	9.1%
2022	2	4.5%
2023	3	6.8%

Which technologies does Pixia Corp. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 39

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 26

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 22

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 20

G09G - Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Devices Using Static Means TO Present Variable Information 6

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 4

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Pixia Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Pixia Corp.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 88.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #7,458 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Pixia Corp. against Omni United (S) PTE Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 38.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.