Where does Phoenix Tailings, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Phoenix Tailings, Inc. ranks #42,329 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Phoenix Tailings, Inc. hold?

Phoenix Tailings, Inc. holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2022 and 2025, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is Phoenix Tailings, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Phoenix Tailings, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 49.6 out of 100 (top 14% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Phoenix Tailings, Inc. focus on?

Phoenix Tailings, Inc.'s top technology area is C25C (Processes FOR THE Electrolytic Production, Recovery OR Refining OF METALS; Apparatus Therefor) with 4 patents, ranking #22 of 77 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is Phoenix Tailings, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Phoenix Tailings, Inc..

What does claim depth mean for Phoenix Tailings, Inc.'s patents?

Phoenix Tailings, Inc.'s patents average 33.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Phoenix Tailings, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Phoenix Tailings, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C25C (Processes FOR THE Electrolytic Production, Recovery OR Refining OF METALS; Apparatus Therefor).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Phoenix ranks #42,329 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 5 technology areas.

#42,329
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 14%
by Innovation Score (49.6/100): 33.5
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R42329 · US Corporation #42,329 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #42,329/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Pharmaxis
CPC-NARROW C25C · 5 areas
INNOV-PAR 49.6/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 33.5 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Pharmaxis Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Phoenix’s 49.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (14%) Velocity 20.0 pts (40%) Breadth 7.9 pts (16%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (30%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Phoenix Tailings · this assignee

50
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Phoenix's Innovation Score is 49.6/100 (top 14% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Phoenix?

Each dot is one of Phoenix’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Phoenix’s own 33.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Phoenix vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Phoenix's grants concentrate

Phoenix Tailings, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under C25C (Processes FOR THE Electrolytic Production, Recovery OR Refining OF METALS; Apparatus Therefor). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Phoenix sits between Pharmaxis Ltd. and Photopotech LLC.

Phoenix's three-year grant acceleration

Phoenix Tailings, Inc. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Pharmaxis

6
Phase 2

6
Philips Healthcar…

6
Phineas Products

6
Phosphorus Free W…

6
Photogauge

6
Photonmd

6
Photopotech

6
Phoenix Tailings ◀

6

What this shows Phoenix holds 6 patents at rank #42,386, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Phoenix

By rank, the assignees closest to #42,386 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C25C (Processes FOR THE Electrolytic Production)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Phoenix's primary technology class.

Phoenix's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

50 Top 14% higher than 86% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2022–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Phoenix Tailings, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2022	1	16.7%
2023	1	16.7%
2024	2	33.3%
2025partial year	2	33.3%

Which technologies does Phoenix Tailings, Inc. patent most?

C25C - Processes FOR THE Electrolytic Production, Recovery OR Refining OF METALS; Apparatus Therefor 4

C22B - Production AND Refining OF Metals ; Pretreatment OF RAW Materials 4

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 2

C25B - Electrolytic OR Electrophoretic Processes FOR THE Production OF Compounds OR NON-METALS; Apparatus Therefor 1

B01D - Separation 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Phoenix Tailings, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Phoenix Tailings, Inc.'s lead technology class is C25C (Processes FOR THE Electrolytic Production, Recovery OR Refining OF METALS; Apparatus Therefor), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C25C
Ranked #42,329 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Phoenix Tailings, Inc. against Pharmaxis Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 49.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.