Phantom Cyber Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Phantom ranks #42,318 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #42,318
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 8th percentile
- by Innovation Score (21.0/100)
- 15.5
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R42318 · US Corporation #42,318 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #42,318/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Peter Opsvik AS
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 21.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Peter Opsvik AS (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Phantom’s 21.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Phantom
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Spray Nozzle… · near 21
Spray Nozzle… · near
21 score
- Phantom Cyber · this assignee 21
Phantom Cyber · this assignee
21 score
- Chameleon Holding · near 21
Chameleon Holding · near
21 score
- ACE Light & Tech… · near 21
ACE Light & Tech… · near
21 score
- Smith's Consumer… · near 21
Smith's Consumer… · near
21 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Phantom's Innovation Score is 21.0/100 (8th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Phantom?
Each dot is one of Phantom’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Phantom’s own 15.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Phantom's grants concentrate
Phantom Cyber Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). By volume, Phantom sits between Peter Opsvik AS and Phase 2, LLC.
Who files at Phantom's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Peter Opsvik AS
Peter Opsvik AS
6 patents
- Peter Thomas Roth
Peter Thomas Roth, LLC
6 patents
- Pezy Computing K K
Pezy Computing K.K.
6 patents
- Phacil
Phacil, LLC
6 patents
- Pharmafluidics
PharmaFluidics NV
6 patents
- Pharmaq AS
Pharmaq AS
6 patents
- Pharmaxis
Pharmaxis Ltd.
6 patents
- Phase 2
Phase 2, LLC
6 patents
- Phantom Cyber ◀
Phantom Cyber Corporation
6 patents
What this shows Phantom holds 6 patents at rank #42,379, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Phantom
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,379 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Phantom's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Phantom, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), Phantom ranks #6,197 of 13,878 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (21 here).
Phantom's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
21 8th percentile higher than 8% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2018 | 3 | 50.0% |
Which technologies does Phantom Cyber Corporation patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Phantom Cyber Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Phantom Cyber Corporation's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #42,318 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Phantom Cyber Corporation against Peter Opsvik AS, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 21.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.