PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Performance Pulsation Control, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 22 granted patents across 9 technology areas, active 2016–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F16L (PIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
22
Total patents granted
9
CPC technology areas
17.9
Avg claims per patent
+240%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Performance holds 22 US patents across 9 technology areas, rank #13,622 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#13,622
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 20%
by Innovation Score (46.6/100)
17.9
avg claims per patent
+240%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. has been granted 22 US utility patents between 2016 and 2024, placing Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. at rank #13,622 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 9 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.9 claims per patent with primary concentration in F16L (PIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL). As a US Corporation, Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. The composite Innovation Score of 46.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 17 grants, compared with 5 in the 2015–2019 window, a +240% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Performance Pulsation Control, Inc.'s 17.9 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 9 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

How does Performance compare?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus the largest corporate holders, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Performance holds 22 patents, placing it at rank #13,622 overall, well behind the volume leaders but ahead of the tens of thousands of smaller assignees in the dataset.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Performance's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

47 Top 20% higher than 80% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2024

02468 20162017201920202021202220232024 6
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 1 4.5%
2017 2 9.1%
2019 2 9.1%
2020 1 4.5%
2021 3 13.6%
2022 3 13.6%
2023 4 18.2%
2024 6 27.3%

Which technologies does Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. patent most?

Top 9 of 9 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Focused
Claim Depth Standard
Velocity Accelerating

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#13,622

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

46.6 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. hold?
Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. holds 22 US granted patents filed between 2016 and 2024, spanning 9 technology areas.
What is Performance Pulsation Control, Inc.'s Innovation Score?
Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 46.6 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. focus on?
Performance Pulsation Control, Inc.'s top technology area is F16L (PIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL) with 15 patents. The company has filed patents in 9 CPC subclasses total.
Is Performance Pulsation Control, Inc.'s patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Performance Pulsation Control, Inc.'s recent filing velocity is +240% compared to the prior five-year period. This indicates accelerating innovation.
What does claim depth mean for Performance Pulsation Control, Inc.'s patents?
Performance Pulsation Control, Inc.'s patents average 17.9 claims each. This falls within the standard range, providing solid legal coverage.
How is the Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

Guides to patent portfolio analysis

How Innovation Score Works

Understand the four dimensions behind the composite score
How to Read Patent Data

Plain-English guide to CPC codes, claims, and metrics
Patent Moat Analysis

How companies use patents as competitive barriers

How to use this portfolio

Performance's 22 grants land it in the top 20% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Performance ranks #13,622 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in F16L - see who else leads that technology area. F16L leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Explore the patent dataset

F16L technology

Performance Pulsation Control, Inc.'s primary CPC class, all holders and yearly trends
Top 50 patent holders

See where Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. ranks among the largest US patent assignees
All technology classes

Browse every CPC technology area by patent activity
How the score works

The four dimensions behind the Innovation Score

Related

All companies → | All technologies → | Rankings →
Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov