Perfect Site LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2023–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47F (Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Perfect ranks #36,939 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #36,939
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 30%
- by Innovation Score (42.8/100)
- 14.3
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36939 · US Corporation #36,939 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,939/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Pentair Technical…
- CPC-NARROW A47F · 4 areas
- INNOV-PAR 42.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2023–2025 · 3y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Pentair Technical Solutions GMBH (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Perfect’s 42.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Perfect
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Perfect Site · this assignee
Perfect Site · this assignee
43 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Perfect's Innovation Score is 42.8/100 (top 30% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Perfect?
Each dot is one of Perfect’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Perfect’s own 14.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Perfect's grants concentrate
Perfect Site LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 42.9% of grants classified under A47F (Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2024. By volume, Perfect sits between Pentair Technical Solutions GMBH and Pernod Ricard SA.
Perfect's three-year grant acceleration
Perfect Site LLC shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Perfect's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Pentair Technical…
Pentair Technical Solutions GMBH
7 patents
- Peratech IP
Peratech IP Ltd
7 patents
- Perceptin Shenzhen
PerceptIn Shenzhen Limited
7 patents
- Percepto Robotics
Percepto Robotics Ltd
7 patents
- Performance Polya…
Performance Polyamides, SAS
7 patents
- Performance Syste…
Performance Systematix LLC
7 patents
- Perma Pure
Perma Pure LLC
7 patents
- Pernod Ricard
Pernod Ricard SA
7 patents
- Perfect Site ◀
Perfect Site LLC
7 patents
What this shows Perfect holds 7 patents at rank #36,994, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Perfect
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,994 in granted patent volume.
- Pentair Technical Solutions GMBH #36,990 · 7 patents
- Peratech IP Ltd #36,991 · 7 patents
- PerceptIn Shenzhen Limited #36,992 · 7 patents
- Percepto Robotics Ltd #36,993 · 7 patents
- Performance Polyamides, SAS #36,995 · 7 patents
- Performance Systematix LLC #36,996 · 7 patents
- Perma Pure LLC #36,997 · 7 patents
- Pernod Ricard SA #36,998 · 7 patents
Leaders in A47F (Special Furniture)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Perfect's primary technology class.
Perfect's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
43 Top 30% higher than 70% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2024 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2025partial year | 4 | 57.1% |
Which technologies does Perfect Site LLC patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Perfect Site LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Perfect Site LLC's lead technology class is A47F (Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters), 42.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47F
- Ranked #36,939 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Perfect Site LLC against Pentair Technical Solutions GMBH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 42.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.