Where does Perfect Sense, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Perfect Sense, Inc. ranks #15,529 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Perfect Sense, Inc. hold?

Perfect Sense, Inc. holds 19 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2025, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is Perfect Sense, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Perfect Sense, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 37.9 out of 100 (top 42% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Perfect Sense, Inc. focus on?

Perfect Sense, Inc.'s top technology area is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication) with 9 patents, ranking #2,562 of 8,956 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

Is Perfect Sense, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Perfect Sense, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +200% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Perfect Sense, Inc.'s patents?

Perfect Sense, Inc.'s patents average 18.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Perfect Sense, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Perfect Sense, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 19 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Perfect ranks #15,529 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 19 patents across 6 technology areas.

#15,529
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 42%
by Innovation Score (37.9/100): 18.6
avg claims per patent: +200%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R15529 · US Corporation #15,529 · 19 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 19 grants
MID-PACK #15,529/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Parallel Systems
CPC-NARROW H04L · 6 areas
INNOV-THIN 37.9/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +200% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Parallel Systems, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Perfect’s 37.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.3 pts (27%) Velocity 7.8 pts (21%) Breadth 8.7 pts (23%) Claim depth 11.1 pts (29%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Perfect Sense · this assignee

38
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Perfect's Innovation Score is 37.9/100 (top 42% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Perfect?

Each dot is one of Perfect’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Perfect’s own 18.6 claims/patent is at or below the 18.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Perfect vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Perfect's grants concentrate

Perfect Sense, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 47.4% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Perfect sits between Parallel Systems, Inc. and Pop Test Oncology LLC.

Perfect's three-year grant acceleration

Perfect Sense, Inc. shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Parallel Systems

19
Parmigiani Fleuri…

19
Patroness

19
Peck & Hale L L C

19
Pfenex

19
Pipeline Medical

19
Polyic & KG

19
Pop Test Oncology

19
Perfect Sense ◀

19

What this shows Perfect holds 19 patents at rank #15,543, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Perfect

By rank, the assignees closest to #15,543 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Perfect's primary technology class.

Perfect's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

38 Top 42% higher than 58% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Perfect Sense, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	1	5.3%
2018	2	10.5%
2019	1	5.3%
2020	2	10.5%
2021	3	15.8%
2022	3	15.8%
2023	2	10.5%
2024	2	10.5%
2025partial year	3	15.8%

Which technologies does Perfect Sense, Inc. patent most?

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 9

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 8

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 7

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 4

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 4

H04B - Transmission 4

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Perfect Sense, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Perfect Sense, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 47.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
Ranked #15,529 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Perfect Sense, Inc. against Parallel Systems, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 37.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.