Overall rank by patents
#49,543
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H03L (Automatic Control, Starting, Synchronisation OR Stabilisation OF Generators OF Electronic Oscillations OR Pulses).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Perceptia ranks #49,543 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 2 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49543 · US Corporation #49,543 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Pensa Systems, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
P&W Solutions · near
23 score
Innovia Intellectual… · near
23 score
Perceptia Devices · this assignee
23 score
Productos Familia · near
23 score
Transparent… · near
23 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Perceptia's Innovation Score is 23.2/100 (12th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Perceptia Devices, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under H03L (Automatic Control, Starting, Synchronisation OR Stabilisation OF Generators OF Electronic Oscillations OR Pulses). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Perceptia sits between Pensa Systems, Inc. and Perk-Up, Inc..
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Pensa Systems, Inc.
5 patents
Pentron Clinical Technologies, LLC
5 patents
People Against Dirty Holdings Limited
5 patents
Peppermill Design, LLC
5 patents
Perceptia IP Pty Ltd
5 patents
Peregrine Technologies, Inc.
5 patents
Periodic Breathing. LLC
5 patents
Perk-Up, Inc.
5 patents
Perceptia Devices, Inc.
5 patents
What this shows Perceptia holds 5 patents at rank #49,697, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,697 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Perceptia's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Perceptia, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (23 here).
Perceptia's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 12th percentile higher than 12% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2018 | 4 | 80.0% |
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#49,543
of 49,997 tracked assignees
23.2 out of 100
What to do with this data
Perceptia Devices, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.