Where does Peer Bearing Company rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Peer Bearing Company ranks #49,525 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Peer Bearing Company hold?

Peer Bearing Company holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2024, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Peer Bearing Company's Innovation Score?

Peer Bearing Company has an Innovation Score of 41.9 out of 100 (top 32% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Peer Bearing Company's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Peer Bearing Company's recent grant velocity is +300% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Peer Bearing Company's patents?

Peer Bearing Company's patents average 16.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Peer Bearing Company patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Peer Bearing Company

Q: What technology areas does Peer Bearing Company focus on?

Peer Bearing Company's top technology area is F16C (SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings) with 5 patents, ranking #229 of 1,334 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16C (SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Peer ranks #49,525 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 3 technology areas.

#49,525
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 32%
by Innovation Score (41.9/100): 16.0
avg claims per patent: +300%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R49525 · US Corporation #49,525 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #49,525/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH PDQ Mazoo
CPC-NARROW F16C · 3 areas
INNOV-PAR 41.9/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +300% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: PDQ Mazoo, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Peer’s 41.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (15%) Velocity 20.0 pts (48%) Breadth 6.1 pts (15%) Claim depth 9.6 pts (23%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Peer Bearing · this assignee

42
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Peer's Innovation Score is 41.9/100 (top 32% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Peer?

Each dot is one of Peer’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Peer’s own 16.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Peer vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Peer's grants concentrate

Peer Bearing Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under F16C (SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings). By volume, Peer sits between PDQ Mazoo, LLC and Pemko Manufacturing Company, Inc..

Peer's three-year grant acceleration

Peer Bearing Company shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

PDQ Mazoo

5
Pear Sports

5
Pearhead

5
Peel Plastic Prod…

5
Peerless MFG

5
Pegasus Aeronauti…

5
Pelliconi & C S P…

5
Pemko Manufacturi…

5
Peer Bearing ◀

5

What this shows Peer holds 5 patents at rank #49,485, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Peer

By rank, the assignees closest to #49,485 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16C (Shafts)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Peer's primary technology class.

Peer's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

42 Top 32% higher than 68% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Peer Bearing Company patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	20.0%
2021	1	20.0%
2022	1	20.0%
2023	1	20.0%
2024	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Peer Bearing Company patent most?

F16C - SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings 5

F16J - Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings 1

B60B - Vehicle Wheels ; CASTORS; Axles FOR Wheels OR CASTORS; Increasing Wheel Adhesion 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Peer Bearing Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Peer Bearing Company's lead technology class is F16C (SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16C
Ranked #49,525 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Peer Bearing Company against PDQ Mazoo, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 41.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.