Peach State Labs, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: D06M (Treatment, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere IN Class D06, OF Fibres, Threads, Yarns, Fabrics, Feathers OR Fibrous Goods Made From Such Materials).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Peach ranks #49,518 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #49,518
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 15th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.7/100)
- 14.2
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49518 · US Corporation #49,518 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,518/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Patio Plants V O F
- CPC-NARROW D06M · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.7/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Patio Plants V.O.F. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Peach’s 24.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Peach
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Peach State Labs · this assignee 25
Peach State Labs · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Peach's Innovation Score is 24.7/100 (15th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Peach?
Each dot is one of Peach’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Peach’s own 14.2 claims/patent is at or below the 16.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Peach's grants concentrate
Peach State Labs, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under D06M (Treatment, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere IN Class D06, OF Fibres, Threads, Yarns, Fabrics, Feathers OR Fibrous Goods Made From Such Materials). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Peach sits between Patio Plants V.O.F. and Peerbridge Health, Inc..
Who files at Peach's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Patio Plants V O F
Patio Plants V.O.F.
5 patents
- Patterson Fan
Patterson Fan Company
5 patents
- Paulus Holdings
Paulus Holdings Limited
5 patents
- Pay2day Solutions
Pay2Day Solutions, Inc.
5 patents
- Peacock Law P C
Peacock Law P.C.
5 patents
- Pebble Mobility
Pebble Mobility Inc.
5 patents
- Peddinghaus
Peddinghaus Corporation
5 patents
- Peerbridge Health
Peerbridge Health, Inc.
5 patents
- Peach State Labs ◀
Peach State Labs, LLC
5 patents
What this shows Peach holds 5 patents at rank #49,682, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Peach
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,682 in granted patent volume.
- Patio Plants V.O.F. #49,678 · 5 patents
- Patterson Fan Company #49,679 · 5 patents
- Paulus Holdings Limited #49,680 · 5 patents
- Pay2Day Solutions, Inc. #49,681 · 5 patents
- Peacock Law P.C. #49,683 · 5 patents
- Pebble Mobility Inc. #49,684 · 5 patents
- Peddinghaus Corporation #49,685 · 5 patents
- Peerbridge Health, Inc. #49,686 · 5 patents
Leaders in D06M (Treatment)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Peach's primary technology class.
Peach's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 15th percentile higher than 15% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Peach State Labs, LLC patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Peach State Labs, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Peach State Labs, LLC's lead technology class is D06M (Treatment, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere IN Class D06, OF Fibres, Threads, Yarns, Fabrics, Feathers OR Fibrous Goods Made From Such Materials), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore D06M
- Ranked #49,518 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Peach State Labs, LLC against Patio Plants V.O.F., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.